Cited by 186Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Molecular characterization of the translocation breakpoints in the down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn

Open access
Reinholdt, Laura G., Ding, Yueming, Gilbert, Griffith T., Czechanski, Anne, Solzak, Jeffrey P., Roper, Randall J., Johnson, Mark T., Donahue, Leah Rae +2 more·2011·Mammalian Genome

Abstract

Ts65Dn is a mouse model of Down syndrome: a syndrome that results from chromosome (Chr) 21 trisomy and is associated with congenital defects, cognitive impairment, and ultimately Alzheimer's disease. Ts65Dn mice have segmental trisomy for distal mouse Chr 16, a region sharing conserved synteny with human Chr 21. As a result, this strain harbors three copies of over half of the human Chr 21 orthologs. The trisomic segment of Chr 16 is present as a translocation chromosome (Mmu17(16)), with breakpoints that have not been defined previously. To molecularly characterize the Chrs 16 and 17 breakpoints on the translocation chromosome in Ts65Dn mice, we used a selective enrichment and high-throughput paired-end sequencing approach. Analysis of paired-end reads flanking the Chr 16, Chr 17 junction on Mmu17(16) and de novo assembly of the reads directly spanning the junction provided the precise locations of the Chrs 16 and 17 breakpoints at 84,351,351 and 9,426,822 bp, respectively. These data provide the basis for low-cost, highly efficient genotyping of Ts65Dn mice. More importantly, these data provide, for the first time, complete characterization of gene dosage in Ts65Dn mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most notable identified limitation of the Ts65Dn model is that the trisomic mice also contain ~35 protein coding genes found on mouse chromosome 17 that are not homologous to Hsa21.

    “Limitations of the Ts65Dn model have been identified, the most notable being that the trisomic mice also contain ~35 protein coding genes found on mouse chromosome 17 that are not homologous to Hsa21 (Duchon et al., 2011; Reinholdt et al., 2011).”

    From Sex-specific developmental alterations in DYRK1A expression in the brain of a Down syndrome mouse model (2024) · cites this paper as Reinholdt et al., 2011

    The Results (page unavailable) show that the extra Ts65Dn chromosome carries a mouse Chr 17 region syntenic with human Chr 6 rather than Hsa21. But the paper counts 60 annotations across protein-coding genes, pseudogenes, and non-coding RNAs; it does not establish the claimed figure of approximately 35 protein-coding genes. The Discussion (page unavailable) notes that the phenotypic effects of extra copies of genes in this region remain unknown. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 186

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Akeson EC Davisson MT 2001 Mitotic chromosome preparations from mouse cells for karyotyping Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 4 Unit 4.10 18428279
  2. Akeson EC Lambert JP Narayanswami S Gardiner K Bechtel LJ Davisson MT 2001 Ts65Dn --localization of the translocation breakpoint and trisomic gene content in a mouse model for Down syndrome Cytogenet Cell Genet 93 270 276 11528125
  3. Costa AC Stasko MR Schmidt C Davisson MT 2010 Behavioral validation of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome of a genetic background free of the retinal degeneration mutation Pde6b(rd1) Behav Brain Res 206 52 62 19720087 PMC2783207
  4. D’Ascenzo M Meacham C Kitzman J Middle C Knight J Winer R Kukricar M Richmond T Albert TJ Czechanski A Donahue LR Affourtit J Jeddeloh JA Reinholdt L 2009 Mutation discovery in the mouse using genetically guided array capture and resequencing Mamm Genome 20 424 436 19629596 PMC2829192
  5. Davisson M Akeson E Schmidt C Harris B Farley J Handel MA 2007 Impact of trisomy on fertility and meiosis in male mice Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 22 468 476 17050550
  6. Davisson MT Schmidt C Reeves RH Irving NG Akeson EC Harris BS Bronson RT 1993 Segmental trisomy as a mouse model for Down syndrome Progress in clinical and biological research 384 117 133 8115398
  7. Hodges E Rooks M Xuan Z Bhattacharjee A Benjamin Gordon D Brizuela L Richard McCombie W Hannon GJ 2009 Hybrid selection of discrete genomic intervals on custom-designed microarrays for massively parallel sequencing Nat Protoc 4 960 974 19478811 PMC2990409
  8. Kabotyanski EB Gomelsky L Han JO Stamato TD Roth DB 1998 Double-strand break repair in Ku86-and XRCC4-deficient cells Nucleic Acids Res 26 5333 5342 9826756 PMC147996
  9. Li Z Yu T Morishima M Pao A LaDuca J Conroy J Nowak N Matsui S Shiraishi I Yu YE 2007 Duplication of the entire 22.9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities Hum Mol Genet 16 1359 1366 17412756
  10. Liu DP Schmidt C Billings T Davisson MT 2003 Quantitative PCR genotyping assay for the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome Bio Techniques 35 1170 1174 14682051
  11. Lorenzi H Duvall N Cherry SM Reeves RH Roper RJ PCR prescreen for genotyping the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome Bio Techniques 48 35 38 PMC2955870 20095097
  12. Moore CS Lee JS Birren B Stetten G Baxter LL Reeves RH 1999 Integration of cytogenetic with recombinational and physical maps of mouse chromosome 16 Genomics 59 1 5 10395793
  13. Reeves RH Irving NG Moran TH Wohn A Kitt C Sisodia SS Schmidt C Bronson RT Davisson MT 1995 A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits Nature genetics 11 177 184 7550346
  14. Reinholdt LG Czechanski A Kamdar S King BL Sun F Handel MA 2009 Meiotic behavior of aneuploid chromatin in mouse models of Down syndrome Chromosoma 118 723 736 19639331 PMC2848991
  15. Rigby PW Dieckmann M Rhodes C Berg P 1977 Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I J Mol Biol 113 237 251 881736
  16. Russell WL Bangham JW Russell LB 1998 Differential response of mouse male germ-cell stages to radiation-induced specific-locus and dominant mutations Genetics 148 1567 1578 9560376 PMC1460062
  17. Talkowski ME Ernst C Heilbut A Chiang C Hanscom C Lindgren A Kirby A Liu S Muddukrishna B Ohsumi TK Shen Y Borowsky M Daly MJ Morton CC Gusella JF 2011 Next-generation sequencing strategies enable routine detection of balanced chromosome rearrangements for clinical diagnostics and genetic research American journal of human genetics 88 469 481 21473983 PMC3071919
  18. Vilella AJ Severin J Ureta-Vidal A Heng L Durbin R Birney E 2009 EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates Genome research 19 327 335 19029536 PMC2652215

Authors
Reinholdt, L. G., Ding, Y., Gilbert, G. T., Czechanski, A., Solzak, J. P., Roper, R. J., Johnson, M. T., Donahue, L. R., Lutz, C., & Davisson, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
  • Purdue University in Indianapolis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Reinholdt, Laura G.
Venue
Mammalian Genome
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
22
Issue
11-12
Pages
685-691
ISSN
  • 0938-8990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1777
OpenAlex
W2030669013
Cited by
186
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mammalian Genome (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (CYTO-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (#CA34196, P30CA034196)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE021034, R15DE021034)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000006C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
Ts65Dn mouse model, Down syndrome, translocation breakpoints, mouse chromosome 16, mouse chromosome 17, gene dosage, synteny, genotyping, paired-end sequencing, de novo assembly
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Female, Genotype, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Translocation, Genetic, Trisomy, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Dosage, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mice, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review