The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid settlement in broadcast spawning corals: implications for larval dispersal
Open accessAbstract
Broadcast spawning of gametes with planktonic development of larvae is the most common reproductive mode in tropical corals, and is generally thought to optimize the dispersal potential of larvae. To this end, many previous studies of coral larval dispersal have focused on the maximum time larvae can remain competent to settle and consequently how far they might disperse. However, dispersal ability of broadcast-spawned coral larvae will be linked, at least in part, to the minimum time to settlement competency as well as the length of the planktonic period—although estimates of minimum time to competency remain largely anecdotal, with few rigorous studies of the pre-competent period. To determine the minimum time to larval settlement in two species of broadcast-spawning coral (Platygyra daedalea and Goniastrea favulus), we monitored larval settlement rates in aquaria every 6 h from the time larvae commenced swimming (i.e. were ciliated, fully developed larvae) for a period of approximately 10 days. For P. daedalea, peak settlement occurred between 60 and 66 h following fertilization (2.5 and 2.75 days), which is markedly earlier than the 4- to 6-day time period commonly cited as the minimum time before broadcast-spawned coral larvae are competent to settle. Surprisingly, it was also clear from our experimental results that settlement in P. daedalea occurred as a distinct pulse during the 60- to 66-h period, rather than continuously throughout the study period. G. favulus larvae also appear to be able to settle quickly (from 54 h following fertilization). We argue, on the basis of these short competency times and apparently rapid settlement, that dispersal in broadcast-spawning coral larvae may not be as great as has previously been assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
Babcock, R. C., Bull, G. D., Harrison, P. L., Heyward, A. J., Oliver, J. K., Wallace, C. C., & Willis, B. L. (1986) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00428562 · Cited by 788
Cited by
Coral bleaching: the role of the host
Baird, A. H., Bhagooli, R., Ralph, P. J., & Takahashi, S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.005 · Cited by 585
Jones, G. P., Almany, G. R., Russ, G. R., Sale, P. F., Steneck, R. S., van Oppen, M. J. H., & Willis, B. L. (2009) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-009-0469-9 · Cited by 561
Isolation by distance in the scleractinian coral Seriatopora hystrix from the Red Sea
Maier, E., Tollrian, R., Rinkevich, B., & Nürnberger, B. (2005) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0013-6 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, K., & Mundy, C.
- Venue
- Coral Reefs
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 0722-4028 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0975
- OpenAlex
- W2021712343
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid settlement in broadcast spawning corals: implications for larval dispersal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00338-003-0290-9
- The paper
- Miller, K., & Mundy, C. (2003). Rapid settlement in broadcast spawning corals: implications for larval dispersal. Coral Reefs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0290-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.