Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laser spectroscopy for breath analysis: towards clinical implementation

Open access
Henderson, Ben, Khodabakhsh, Amir, Metsälä, Markus, Ventrillard, Irène, Schmidt, Florian M., Romanini, Daniele, Ritchie, Grant A. D., te Lintel Hekkert, Sacco, Briot, Raphaël, Risby, Terence, Marczin, Nandor, Harren, Frans J. M., Cristescu, Simona M.·2018·Applied Physics B

Abstract

Detection and analysis of volatile compounds in exhaled breath represents an attractive tool for monitoring the metabolic status of a patient and disease diagnosis, since it is non-invasive and fast. Numerous studies have already demonstrated the benefit of breath analysis in clinical settings/applications and encouraged multidisciplinary research to reveal new insights regarding the origins, pathways, and pathophysiological roles of breath components. Many breath analysis methods are currently available to help explore these directions, ranging from mass spectrometry to laser-based spectroscopy and sensor arrays. This review presents an update of the current status of optical methods, using near and mid-infrared sources, for clinical breath gas analysis over the last decade and describes recent technological developments and their applications. The review includes: tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, cavity ring-down spectroscopy, integrated cavity output spectroscopy, cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, photoacoustic spectroscopy, quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy, and optical frequency comb spectroscopy. A SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) is presented that describes the laser-based techniques within the clinical framework of breath research and their appealing features for clinical use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00340-018-7030-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Henderson, B., Khodabakhsh, A., Metsälä, M., Ventrillard, I., Schmidt, F. M., Romanini, D., Ritchie, G. A. D., te Lintel Hekkert, S., Briot, R., Risby, T., Marczin, N., Harren, F. J. M., & Cristescu, S. M.
Venue
Applied Physics B
Published
2018-07-28
Volume
124
Issue
8
Pages
161-161
ISSN
  • 0721-7269 (ISSN-L)
  • 0946-2171
  • 1432-0649
OpenAlex
W2884799384
Cited by
224
References
1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laser spectroscopy for breath analysis: towards clinical implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00340-018-7030-x
The paper
Henderson, B., Khodabakhsh, A., Metsälä, M., Ventrillard, I., Schmidt, F. M., Romanini, D., Ritchie, G. A. D., te Lintel Hekkert, S., Briot, R., Risby, T., Marczin, N., Harren, F. J. M., & Cristescu, S. M. (2018). Laser spectroscopy for breath analysis: towards clinical implementation. Applied Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-018-7030-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.