The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Full device independent QKD allows security to be proven without any knowledge of the devices used in the implementation.
“One such solution is known as the full device independent QKD [95,96], where the security can be proven without any knowledge of the devices used in the implementation.”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [96]
The Introduction and Conclusions discuss photonic Bell-state measurements and the efficiency of a linear-optical analyzer, not QKD security. Searches for device-independent QKD and security without knowledge of implementation devices found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- S. J. van Enk, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5178 (1997)
- C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
- C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992)
- D. Gottesman and I.L. Chuang, Nature 402, 390 (1999)
- N. Lütkenhaus, J. Calsamiglia, K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3295 (1999)
- H. Weinfurter, Europhys. Lett. 25, 559 (1994);
- S. L. Braunstein and A. Mann, Phys. Rev. A 51, R1727 (1995);
- M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58 (1994).
- M. A. Naǐmark, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat.4, 277 (1940)
- C. W. Helstrom Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976)
- A. Chefles, Phys.Lett. A 239, 339 (1998)
- K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 53, R1209 (1996)
- A. Tomita, e-print quant-ph/0006088 · arXiv
- M.G.A. Paris, M. B. Plenio, D. Jonathan, S. Bose and G. M. D'Ariano e-print quant-ph/9911036 · arXiv
- D. Bouwmeester, e-print quant-ph/0006108 · arXiv
- C. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, W. K. Wootters Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bilocal versus nonbilocal correlations in entanglement-swapping experiments
Branciard, C., Rosset, D., Gisin, N., & Pironio, S. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.032119 · Cited by 258
Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing
Takeda, S., & Furusawa, A. (2019) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.5100160 · Cited by 234
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Quantum repeaters based on single trapped ions
Sangouard, N., Dubessy, R., & Simon, C. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.042340 · Cited by 144
Experimental test of local observer independence
Proietti, M., Pickston, A., Graffitti, F., Barrow, P., Kundys, D., Branciard, C., Ringbauer, M., & Fedrizzi, A. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw9832 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Calsamiglia, J., & Lütkenhaus, N.
- Venue
- Applied Physics B
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-71
- ISSN
- 0946-2171
- 1432-0649
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
