Cited by 69Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Amphibious auditory responses of the American alligator ( Alligator mississipiensis )

D., Higgs, E., Brittan-Powell, D., Soares, M., Souza, C., Carr, R., Dooling, A., Popper·2002·Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

Abstract

Animals that thrive both on land and underwater are faced with the task of interpreting stimuli in different media. This becomes a challenge to the sensory receptors in that stimuli (e.g., sound, motion) may convey the same type of information but are transmitted with different physical characteristics. We used auditory brainstem responses to examine hearing abilities of a species that makes full use of these two environments, the American alligator (Alligator mississipiensis). In water, alligators responded to tones from 100 Hz to 2,000 Hz, with peak sensitivity at 800 Hz. In air, they responded to tones from 100 Hz to 8,000 Hz, with peak sensitivity around 1,000 Hz. We also examined the contribution to hearing of an air bubble that becomes trapped in the middle ear as the animal submerges. This bubble has been previously implicated in underwater hearing. Our studies show that the trapped air bubble has no affect on auditory thresholds, suggesting the bubble is not an important adaptation for underwater hearing in this species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00359-002-0296-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acoustic signals are detected by individuals differently in air (by ear) than underwater (likely by bone conduction), resulting in a broader range of frequencies being detected in air, but over longer propagation distances underwater.

    “Acoustic signals are detected by individuals differently in air (by ear) than underwater (likely by bone conduction) (Higgs et al. 2002), which results in a broader range of frequencies being detected in air, but over longer propagation distances underwater (Higgs et al. 2002; Todd 2007).”
  • Signals measured in air were (and are) not comparable to the same signals measured underwater, due to both differences in sound propagation and differences in crocodylian acoustic signal perception.

    “Likewise, signals measured in air were (and are) not comparable to the same signals measured underwater, due to both differences in sound propagation and differences in crocodylian acoustic signal perception (Higgs et al. 2002; Papet et al. 2019).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 69

Authors
D., H., E., B.-P., D., S., M., S., C., C., R., D., & A., P.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
188
Issue
3
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
OpenAlex
W2022790026
Cited by
69
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r03dc004502-03)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DCD 00436, T32-DC-00046, DC-00198, DC04502-01, T32DC000046)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
Alligator mississippiensis, underwater hearing, auditory brainstem response, frequency sensitivity, hearing threshold
MeSH terms
Air, Alligators and Crocodiles, Animals, Auditory Perception, Auditory Threshold, Behavior, Animal, Environment, Water, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review