The vertical lobe of cephalopods: an attractive brain structure for understanding the evolution of advanced learning and memory systems
Abstract
In this review we show that the cephalopod vertical lobe (VL) provides a good system for assessing the level of evolutionary convergence of the function and organization of neuronal circuitry for mediating learning and memory in animals with complex behavior. The pioneering work of JZ Young described the morphological convergence of the VL with the mammalian hippocampus, cerebellum and the insect mushroom body. Studies in octopus and cuttlefish VL networks suggest evolutionary convergence into a universal organization of connectivity as a divergence-convergence ('fan-out fan-in') network with activity-dependent long-term plasticity mechanisms. Yet, these studies also show that the properties of the neurons, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and mechanisms of long-term potentiation (LTP) induction and maintenance are highly variable among different species. This suggests that complex networks may have evolved independently multiple times and that even though memory and learning networks share similar organization and cellular processes, there are many molecular ways of constructing them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The vertical lobe in cuttlefish presents similarities to vertebrate hippocampus formation in its connectivity and functionality.
“Instead, the structure representing the epicentre for learning and memory in cuttlefish is known as the vertical lobe, which presents similarities to vertebrate hippocampus formation in its connectivity and functionality [135–137].”
From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Shomrat, T., Turchetti-Maia, A. L., Stern-Mentch, N., Basil, J. A., & Hochner, B.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Brooklyn College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hochner, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Physiology A
- Published
- 2015-06-26
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 947-956
- ISSN
- 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1351
- OpenAlex
- W931741147
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation (2011466)
- Israel Science Foundation (1425-11)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- learning and memory, convergent evolution, neural circuits, octopus, cuttlefish, hippocampus, cerebellum, mushroom body, long-term plasticity, long-term potentiation, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Learning, Memory, Synapses, Cephalopoda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review