Cited by 66Physiological and biochemical adaptationsAvian ecology and behaviorInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Hummingbirds pay a high cost for a warm drink

Lotz, C. N., Mart�nez del Rio, C., Nicolson, S. W.·2003·Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology

Abstract

Endotherms must warm ingested food to body temperature. Food warming costs may be especially high for nectar-feeding birds, which can ingest prodigious volumes. We formulated a mathematical model to predict the cost of warming nectar as a function of nectar temperature and sugar concentration. This model predicts that the cost of warming nectar should: (1) decrease as a power function of nectar concentration, and (2) increase linearly with the difference between body temperature and nectar temperature. We tested our model on rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus). A typical experiment consisted of feeding birds nectar of a given concentration at 39 degrees C (equivalent to body temperature) and then at 4 degrees C, and vice versa. We used the percentage change in metabolic rate between the two food temperatures to estimate the cost of warming nectar. The model's predictions were accurately met. When birds had to hover rather than perch during feeding bouts, estimated food-warming costs were only slightly lower. The cost of warming nectar to body temperature appears to be an important yet overlooked aspect of the energy budgets of nectar-feeding birds. Hummingbirds feeding on 5% sucrose solutions at 4 degrees C have to increase their metabolic rate by an amount equivalent to that elicited by a 15 degrees C drop in ambient temperature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00360-003-0346-8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower nectar temperatures will impose additional energetic costs on meal acquisition by hummingbirds.

    “lower nectar temperatures will impose additional energetic costs on meal acquisition by hummingbirds (Lotz et al., 2003)”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Lotz et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lotz, C. N., Mart�nez del Rio, C., & Nicolson, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
173
Issue
6
Pages
455-462
ISSN
  • 0174-1578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-136X
OpenAlex
W2131122595
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
hummingbirds, nectar feeding, endothermy, metabolic rate, sugar content, Rufous hummingbird, Selasphorus rufus, energy balance, hover feeding, mathematical model
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Electronic Data Processing, Birds, Body Temperature, Body Temperature Regulation, Calorimetry, Indirect, Drinking, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Models, Theoretical, Oxygen Consumption, Sucrose, Water, Thermogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review