Satellite image encryption based on RNA and 7D complex chaotic system
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many of these methods lack standardization, real-time validation, or scalability to high-resolution datasets.
“many of these methods lack standardization, real-time validation, or scalability to high-resolution datasets”
From Hyperchaotic fractional-order image encryption with Knight’s tour scrambling for satellite imagery (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Zhao, L., Zhao, L., Cui, F., & Sun, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Lilong
- Venue
- The Visual Computer
- Published
- 2023-10-20
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5659-5679
- ISSN
- 0178-2789 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2315
- OpenAlex
- W4387817874
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Visual Computer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1800901, 2018YFB1800905)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62075097, 62075038, 61975084, 61935005, 61835005, 61822507, 62005125, 61775098, 61875248, 61727817, U2001601, 62035018, 61720106015, 61935011)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Keywords
- Arnold transform, chaotic sequences, codon substitution, image security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
