Biochar and fertiliser applications influence phosphorus fractionation and wheat yield
Abstract
The use of biochar in agriculture to achieve the dual benefits of improving soil quality whilst sequestering carbon (C) has received much attention. However, in low-intensity broadacre agricultural systems where yield is constrained by rainfall and costs associated with phosphorus (P) fertiliser, the application of biochar at rates commonly reported (>10 t ha⁻¹) are likely to be prohibitively expensive where yield benefits cannot be guaranteed. In marginal areas where calcareous soils dominate, biochar application has no liming effect, reducing its value compared to application in acidic soils. In the present study, we use a field experiment to investigate the interaction between P fertilisation and biochar banding at low application rates (<1 t ha⁻¹) on wheat yield and soil P fractionation (assessed by a modified Hedley method) in a highly alkaline Haplic Calcisol in a dryland broadacre cropping system. Our results demonstrate no statistically significant effect of low rate biochar banding on wheat yield in this highly P-constrained soil, but a significant effect of both biochar and fertiliser on P fractionation in both years of the study. Higher P fertiliser rates significantly increased wheat yield in all biochar treatments. The interactions between biochar, P fertiliser and P fractionation indicate shifts in potential P availability both as a result of P fertilisation and also biochar application. Further work is required in low productivity calcareous systems such as that studied here to elucidate the potential for biochar amendment to improve productivity and sequester C.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Farrell et al. (2014) reported no significant effect on wheat yield at a low application rate (<1.0 Mg ha−1) of biochar in highly P-constrained calcareous soil, but a prominent effect of both biochar and fertilizer on P fractionation was observed.
“Farrell et al. (2014) reported no significant effect on wheat yield at a low application rate (<1.0 Mg ha -1 ) of biochar in highly P-constrained calcareous soil, but a prominent effect of both biochar and fertilizer on P fractionation was observed.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Farrell et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Farrell, M., Macdonald, L. M., Butler, G., Chirino-Valle, I., & Condron, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Lincoln University (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Farrell, Mark
- Venue
- Biology and Fertility of Soils
- Published
- 2013-08-13
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-178
- ISSN
- 0178-2762 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0789
- OpenAlex
- W1984878444
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biology and Fertility of Soils (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
- Keywords
- biochar, phosphorus fertilizer, phosphorus fractionation, wheat yield, calcareous soils, soil available phosphorus, carbon sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review