Cited by 150Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationPhosphorus and nutrient management

Biochar and fertiliser applications influence phosphorus fractionation and wheat yield

Farrell, Mark, Macdonald, Lynne M., Butler, Greg, Chirino-Valle, Ivan, Condron, Leo M.·2014·Biology and Fertility of Soils

Abstract

The use of biochar in agriculture to achieve the dual benefits of improving soil quality whilst sequestering carbon (C) has received much attention. However, in low-intensity broadacre agricultural systems where yield is constrained by rainfall and costs associated with phosphorus (P) fertiliser, the application of biochar at rates commonly reported (>10 t ha⁻¹) are likely to be prohibitively expensive where yield benefits cannot be guaranteed. In marginal areas where calcareous soils dominate, biochar application has no liming effect, reducing its value compared to application in acidic soils. In the present study, we use a field experiment to investigate the interaction between P fertilisation and biochar banding at low application rates (<1 t ha⁻¹) on wheat yield and soil P fractionation (assessed by a modified Hedley method) in a highly alkaline Haplic Calcisol in a dryland broadacre cropping system. Our results demonstrate no statistically significant effect of low rate biochar banding on wheat yield in this highly P-constrained soil, but a significant effect of both biochar and fertiliser on P fractionation in both years of the study. Higher P fertiliser rates significantly increased wheat yield in all biochar treatments. The interactions between biochar, P fertiliser and P fractionation indicate shifts in potential P availability both as a result of P fertilisation and also biochar application. Further work is required in low productivity calcareous systems such as that studied here to elucidate the potential for biochar amendment to improve productivity and sequester C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00374-013-0845-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 150

Authors
Farrell, M., Macdonald, L. M., Butler, G., Chirino-Valle, I., & Condron, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Farrell, Mark
Venue
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Published
2013-08-13
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
169-178
ISSN
  • 0178-2762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0789
OpenAlex
W1984878444
Cited by
150
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9
FWCI
17.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biology and Fertility of Soils (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
Keywords
biochar, phosphorus fertilizer, phosphorus fractionation, wheat yield, calcareous soils, soil available phosphorus, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review