Cited by 213Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPhosphorus and nutrient managementAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solubilization of hydroxyapatite by Enterobacter agglomerans and cloned Escherichia coli in culture medium

Kim, K. Y., McDonald, G. A., Jordan, D.·1997·Biology and Fertility of Soils

Abstract

Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) possessing the ability to solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphate were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of wheat. A laboratory study was conducted to investigate the solubilization of phosphate by a known PSB, Enterobacter agglomerans, and by a genetically manipulated bacterium, Escherichia coli. A second laboratory study investigated the release of P from E. agglomerans compared with known acids. For the first laboratory study, a cosmid (pHC79) library of phosphate-solubilizing gene(s) from E. agglomerans chromosome DNA was constructed in E. coli JM 109. The clone JM 109 (pKKY) showing phosphate solubilization properties was screened on standard medium containing hydroxyapatite (HY). The P concentration significantly increased at 5 and 10 days for JM 109 (pKKY) compared with JM 109 (pHC79), the control. Although the P concentration increased, there was no significant change in their pHs. Furthermore, an increase in colony-forming units (CFUs) was seen at 5 and 10 days for JM 109 (PKKY) but not for JM 109 (pHC79). Artificial acidification of the culture medium with HCl, citric acid, oxalic acid, and lactic acid was achieved by shaking for 48 h. Acidification with these selected acids solubilized more HY than E. agglomerans growing for 42 h at similar pHs. However, a high P concentration was measured in culture medium with E. agglomerans growing for 84 h despite similar pHs. Our results suggest that acid production may play an important…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s003740050256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, K. Y., McDonald, G. A., & Jordan, D.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Published
1997-05-05
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
347-352
ISSN
  • 0178-2762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0789
OpenAlex
W1980288877
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biology and Fertility of Soils (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, Pantoea agglomerans, Escherichia coli, cosmid library, rhizosphere soil, wheat, acid production, citric acid, oxalic acid, lactic acid, hydrochloric acid, inorganic phosphate release

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review