Cited by 4Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Craniosynostosis, psychomotor retardation, and facial dysmorphic features in a Spanish patient with a 4q27q28.3 deletion

Fernández-Jaén, Alberto, Fernández-Perrone, Ana Laura, Fernández-Mayoralas, Daniel Martín, Calleja-Pérez, Beatriz, Sánchez-Hombre, María del Carmen, Fernández, Ester Corbacho, López-Martín, Sara·2014·Child's Nervous System

Abstract

Case report We describe an unusual clinical case with an 11-Mb deletion at 4q27 (chr4: 123094652-134164491), craniosynostosis (CS), mild psychomotor retardation, and facial dysmorphic features. This deletion involves 18 genes; FGF2, NUDT6, and SPRY1 are primarily or secondarily implicated in human cranial bone and sagittal suture development and could play an important role in CS.Conclusions Clinicians should always contemplate genetic studies in patients with syndromic CS. Mutational targeted genetic testing is appropriate for patients with classical or specific CS syndrome. Nevertheless, array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) should be considered as a first-line test in nontypical syndromic CS phenotype. Cytogenetic studies are decisive for genetic counseling indeed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00381-014-2474-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered gene dosage and disrupted regulation can contribute to sCS even in the absence of pathogenic coding variants.

    “Tandem duplications of upstream IHH enhancers, rare chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications, and CNVs involving regions that include genes such as FGF2, SPRY1, SEMA5A, FBLN2, and TMEM43 support the concept that altered gene dosage and disrupted regulation can contribute to sCS even in the absence of pathogenic coding variants [64, 85, 87, 115, 124].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 4

Authors
Fernández-Jaén, A., Fernández-Perrone, A. L., Fernández-Mayoralas, D. M., Calleja-Pérez, B., Sánchez-Hombre, M. D. C., Fernández, E. C., & López-Martín, S.
Venue
Child's Nervous System
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2157-2161
ISSN
  • 0256-7040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0350
OpenAlex
W2104076444
Cited by
4
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child s Nervous System (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
craniosynostosis, psychomotor retardation, facial dysmorphism, FGF2, SPRY1, syndromic craniosynostosis, array comparative genomic hybridization, genetic counseling
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Child, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, Craniosynostoses, Fetal Growth Retardation, Genetic Counseling, Genotype, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Intellectual Disability, Muscular Atrophy, Phosphoproteins, Proteins, Psychomotor Disorders, Fibroblast Growth Factor 2, Facies, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review