Cited by 39Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentChild Abuse and Related Trauma

Cranial ultrasound is a reliable first step imaging in children with suspected craniosynostosis

Pogliani, L., Zuccotti, G. V., Furlanetto, M., Giudici, V., Erbetta, A., Chiapparini, L., Valentini, L.·2017·Child's Nervous System

Abstract

Purpose Skull radiography (SR) and Computed Tomography (CT) are still proposed as the first-line imaging choice for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis (CS) in children with abnormal head shape, but both techniques expose infants to ionizing radiation. Several studies shown that ultrasound may play an important role in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. The aim of our study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cranial ultrasound scan (CUS) and confirm if it is a reliable first step imaging evaluation for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis in newborn.Method A cohort of 196 infants (122/74 males/females), with a mean age of 4 months, clinically suspected to have abnormal closure of cranial sutures, were firstly examined by CUS and then referred to neuroradiologists to perform volumetric CT scan if the suspicion of stenosis was ecographically confirmed; otherwise, a routine follow-up and physical treatment was performed, to observe the evolution of the head shape.Results Of the 196 children studied by CUS, only two had inconclusive studies due to age limitation (>12 months). Thirty children were diagnosed with cranial synostosis at CUS and verified by CT; all the CUS results were confirmed, except two cases, that were revealed as false positives in the starting phase of the study. Twelve patients with very prominent head deformity and negative CUS underwent CT, which confirmed the CUS results in all of them; one case of closure of both temporal sutures, not studied by CUS, was documented by CT. All the 148 children with poor clinical suspicion and negative CUS underwent just a prolonged clinical follow-up. In all of them, a progressive normalization of head shape was observed, and the craniosynostosis was excluded on a clinical base.Conclusions CUS is a highly specific and sensitive imaging technique. In referral centers, expert hands can use it as a reliable first-step screening for infants younger than 1 year, suspected to have a craniosynostosis, thus avoiding unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation. The "golden age" to obtain the best CUS results is under 6 months of life. Because the method is operator-dependent and there is a learning curve, a case centralization is advisable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00381-017-3449-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 39

Authors
Pogliani, L., Zuccotti, G. V., Furlanetto, M., Giudici, V., Erbetta, A., Chiapparini, L., & Valentini, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
Corresponding author
Pogliani, L.
Venue
Child's Nervous System
Published
2017-06-03
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1545-1552
ISSN
  • 0256-7040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0350
OpenAlex
W2621252467
Cited by
39
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child s Nervous System (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
craniosynostosis, cranial ultrasound, diagnostic accuracy, infants, cranial sutures, ionizing radiation avoidance, volumetric CT, first-line imaging, false positives
MeSH terms
Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review