Cited by 68Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction DisordersSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

RET gene is a major risk factor for Hirschsprung’s disease: a meta-analysis

Tomuschat, C., Puri, P.·2015·Pediatric Surgery International

Abstract

Purpose During the past two decades several genes have been identified that control morphogenesis and differentiation of the enteric neuron system (ENS). These genes, when mutated or deleted, interfere with ENS development. RET gene is the major gene causing Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Mutations in RET gene are responsible for 50% of familial HD cases and 15-20% of sporadic cases. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of RET gene mutations in patients with HD and to correlate RET mutations with the extent of aganglionosis. Methods A systematic literature-based search for relevant cohorts was performed using the terms "Hirschsprung's disease AND RET Proto-oncogene", "Hirschsprung's disease AND genetic polymorphism" and "RET Gene". The relevant cohorts of HD were systematically searched for reported mutations in the RET gene (RET+). Data on mutation site, phenotype, and familial or sporadic cases were extracted. Combined odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was calculated to estimate the strength of the different associations. Results In total, 23 studies concerning RET with 1270 individuals affected with HD were included in this study. 228 (18%) of these HDs were RET+. Of these 228, 96 (42%) presented as rectosigmoid, 81 (36%) long segment, 18 (8%) as TCA, 16 (7%) as total intestinal aganglionosis and 17 (7%) individuals were RET+ but no extent of aganglionosis was not reported. In the rectosigmoid group, no significant association between phenotype and RET muta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00383-015-3731-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomuschat, C., & Puri, P.
Affiliations
  • Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Puri, P.
Venue
Pediatric Surgery International
Published
2015-07-12
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
701-710
ISSN
  • 0179-0358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-9813
OpenAlex
W1919489720
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Surgery International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
Hirschsprung disease, RET proto-oncogene, RET mutations, aganglionosis, long-segment aganglionosis, total colonic aganglionosis, rectosigmoid aganglionosis, enteric nervous system development, genetic risk factors, genetic polymorphism
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Mas, Child, Hirschsprung Disease, Humans, Mutation, Risk Factors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review