Cited by 52Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Intensive lipid-lowering therapy for early achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (“Jena auf Ziel”)

Open access
Makhmudova, Umidakhon, Samadifar, Beasat, Maloku, Aurel, Haxhikadrija, Pellumb, Geiling, Jens-Arndt, Römer, Robert, Lauer, Bernward, Möbius-Winkler, Sven +3 more·2023·Clinical Research in Cardiology

Abstract

Background and aims: Currently, less than 20% of patients at very high-risk achieve ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guideline-recommended LDL-C target levels in Europe. “Jena auf Ziel—JaZ” is a prospective cohort study in which early combination therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg was initiated on admission in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and lipid-lowering therapy was escalated during follow-up with bempedoic acid and PCSK9 inhibitors to achieve recommended LDL-C targets in all patients. Moreover, we evaluated side-effects of lipid-lowering therapy. Methods: Patients admitted with STEMI at Jena University Hospital were started on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg on admission. Patients were followed for EAS/ESC LDL-C target achievement during follow-up. Results: A total of 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On discharge, 32.9% achieved LDL-C targets on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg. After 4–6 weeks, 80% of all patients on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe started at the index event were on ESC/EAS LDL-C targets. In 20%, combined lipid-lowering therapy was escalated with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors. All patients achieved LDL-C levels of or below 55 mg/dL during follow-up on triple lipid-lowering therapy. Combined lipid-lowering therapy was well-tolerated with rare side effects. Conclusions: Early combination therapy with a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe and escalation of lipid-lowering therapy with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors gets potentially all patients with STEMI on recommended ESC/EAS LDL-C targets without significant side effects. Graphical abstract:

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00392-022-02147-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In secondary prevention patients with ASCVD, a subgroup of 8 patients on high-intensity atorvastatin plus ezetimibe achieved a 15.0% LDL-C reduction at 1 month after escalation to bempedoic acid.

    “In secondary prevention patients with ASCVD, a small subgroup of patients (n = 8) already on high-intensity atorvastatin plus ezetimibe achieved a 15.0% LDL-C reduction at 1 month after escalation to bempedoic acid (baseline LDL-C = 124 mg/dL) [25].”

    From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (‘LDL-C target attainment’; page not provided) report that eight patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg had an additional 15% LDL-C reduction after bempedoic acid was added. The paper does not specify that this reduction was measured one month after escalation. Its baseline LDL-C of approximately 124 mg/dL is reported for the full STEMI cohort, not specifically for those eight patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LDL-C reductions with bempedoic acid added to statins ranged from 15% to 39%.

    “Consistent effects were also seen when bempedoic acid was added to statins (15% to 39%) [25,30,32,38,39,44], and when used in statin intolerant patients (22% to 38%) [24,29,34,35,37,40,41], despite the latter group having higher baseline LDL-C.”

    From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (LDL-C target attainment; page unavailable) report an additional 15% LDL-C reduction when bempedoic acid was added to atorvastatin and ezetimibe in eight patients after STEMI. Our copy does not report a 39% reduction with bempedoic acid, so this paper supports the lower endpoint but not the attributed range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In secondary prevention patients with ASCVD, among a small subgroup (n = 8) already on high-intensity atorvastatin plus ezetimibe, all patients escalated to bempedoic acid achieved an LDL-C target of <54 mg/dL within 1.5 months of follow-up (baseline LDL-C = 124 mg/dL).

    “In secondary prevention patients with ASCVD, among a small subgroup of patients (n = 8) already on high-intensity atorvastatin plus ezetimibe, all patients escalated to bempedoic acid achieved an LDL-C target of <54 mg/dL within 1.5 months of follow-up (baseline LDL-C = 124 mg/dL) [25].”

    From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Real-world LDL-C reductions with bempedoic acid in secondary prevention populations ranged from 15% to 39%.

    “These reductions were reported across both primary (23% to 39%) [24,29,44] and secondary prevention populations (15% to 39%) [25,32,38,39].”

    From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (LDL-C target attainment; page unavailable) report an additional 15% LDL-C reduction after bempedoic acid was added for eight patients after STEMI. This supports the lower end of the cited range in a secondary-prevention population, but the paper does not report a 39% bempedoic-acid reduction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 52

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Ference BA Ginsberg HN Graham I Ray KK Packard CJ Bruckert E Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Eur Heart J. 2017 38 32 2459 2472 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144 28444290 PMC5837225 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Mach F Baigent C Catapano AL Koskinas KC Casula M Badimon L 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk Eur Heart J 2020 41 1 111 188 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 31504418 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Allahyari A Jernberg T Hagström E Leosdottir M Lundman P Ueda P Application of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines to nationwide data of patients with a recent myocardial infarction: a simulation study Eur Heart J 2020 41 40 3900 3909 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa034 32072178 PMC7654933 · DOI
  4. [5]Schubert J Lindahl B Melhus H Renlund H Leosdottir M Yari A Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study Eur Heart J 2021 42 3 243 252 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1011 33367526 PMC7954251 · DOI
  5. [6]Ray KK Molemans B Schoonen WM Giovas P Bray S Kiru G EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021 28 11 1279 1289 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa047 33580789 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Cannon CP, de Lemos JA, Rosenson RS, Ballantyne CM, Liu Y, Gao Q et al (2021) Use of lipid-lowering therapies over 2 years in GOULD, a registry of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the US. JAMA Cardiol PMC8209562 34132735
  7. [8]Landmesser U Pirillo A Farnier M Jukema JW Laufs U Mach F Lipid-lowering therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the ACS patient pathway project Atheroscler Suppl 2020 42 e49 58 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2021.01.009 33589224 · DOI
  8. [9]Lütjohann D Stellaard F Mulder MT Sijbrands EJG Weingärtner O The emerging concept of ‘individualized cholesterol-lowering therapy’: a change in paradigm Pharmacol Ther 2019 199 111 116 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.03.004 30877023 · DOI
  9. [10]Ray KK Changing the paradigm for post-MI cholesterol lowering from intensive statin monotherapy towards intensive lipid-lowering regimens and individualized care Eur Heart J 2021 42 3 253 256 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1008 33454778 · DOI
  10. [11]Ray KK Reeskamp LF Laufs U Banach M Mach F Tokgözoğlu LS Combination lipid-lowering therapy as first-line strategy in very high-risk patients Eur Heart J 2022 43 8 830 833 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab718 34636884 · DOI
  11. [13]Katzmann JL Sorio-Vilela F Dornstauder E Fraas U Smieszek T Zappacosta S Non-statin lipid-lowering therapy over time in very-high-risk patients: effectiveness of fixed-dose statin/ezetimibe compared to separate pill combination on LDL-C-C Clin Res Cardiol 2022 111 3 243 252 10.1007/s00392-020-01740-8 32949286 PMC8873069 · DOI
  12. [14]Jernberg T Hasvold P Henriksson M Hjelm H Thuresson M Janzon M Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective Eur Heart J 2015 36 19 1163 1170 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505 25586123 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [18]Weingärtner O Lütjohann D Böhm M Laufs U Relationship between cholesterol synthesis and intestinal absorption is associated with cardiovascular risk Atherosclerosis 2010 210 2 362 365 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.003 20116793 · DOI
  14. [19]Karlson BW Wiklund O Palmer MK Nicholls SJ Lundman P Barter PJ Variability of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response with different doses of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin: results from VOYAGER Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2016 2 4 212 217 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw006 27533947 · DOI
  15. [20]Miettinen TA Gylling H Strandberg T Sarna S Baseline serum cholestanol as predictor of recurrent coronary events in subgroup of Scandinavian simvastatin survival study. Finnish 4S Investigators BMJ 1998 316 7138 1127 1130 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1127 9552949 PMC28514 · DOI
  16. [21]Miettinen TA Strandberg TE Gylling H Noncholesterol sterols and cholesterol lowering by long-term simvastatin treatment in coronary patients: relation to basal serum cholestanol Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000 20 5 1340 1346 10.1161/01.ATV.20.5.1340 10807752 · DOI
  17. [22]Hagiwara N Kawada-Watanabe E Koyanagi R Arashi H Yamaguchi J Nakao K Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targeting with pitavastatin + ezetimibe for patients with acute coronary syndrome and dyslipidaemia: the HIJ-PROPER study, a prospective, open-label, randomized trial Eur Heart J 2017 38 29 2264 2276 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx162 28430910 PMC5837267 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [23]Kim BK Hong SJ Lee YJ Hong SJ Yun KH Hong BK Long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (RACING): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial Lancet 2022 400 380 390 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00916-3 35863366 · DOI
  19. [24]Amarenco P Kim JS Labreuche J Charles H Giroud M Lee BC Yield of dual therapy with statin and ezetimibe in the treat stroke to target trial Stroke 2022 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039728 36154103 · DOI
  20. [25]Helgadottir A Thorleifsson G Alexandersson KF Tragante V Thorsteinsdottir M Eiriksson FF Genetic variability in the absorption of dietary sterols affects the risk of coronary artery disease Eur Heart J 2020 41 28 2618 2628 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa531 32702746 PMC7377579 · DOI
  21. [26]Teupser D Baber R Ceglarek U Scholz M Illig T Gieger C Genetic regulation of serum phytosterol levels and risk of coronary artery disease Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010 3 4 331 339 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.907873 20529992 · DOI
  22. [28]Weingärtner O Patel SB Lütjohann D It’s time to personalize and optimize lipid-lowering therapy Eur Heart J 2020 41 28 2629 2631 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa445 32702747 · DOI
  23. [29]Fox KM Tai MH Kostev K Hatz M Qian Y Laufs U Treatment patterns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C-C) goal attainment among patients receiving high- or moderate-intensity statins Clin Res Cardiol 2018 107 5 380 388 10.1007/s00392-017-1193-z 29273856 PMC5913378 · DOI
  24. [31]Katzmann JL Kieble M Enners S Böhm M Mahfoud F Laufs U Trends in ezetimibe prescriptions as monotherapy or fixed-dose combination in Germany 2012–2021 Front Cardiovasc Med 2022 9 912785 10.3389/fcvm.2022.912785 35770230 PMC9234160 · DOI

Authors
Makhmudova, U., Samadifar, B., Maloku, A., Haxhikadrija, P., Geiling, J.-A., Römer, R., Lauer, B., Möbius-Winkler, S., Otto, S., Schulze, P. C., & Weingärtner, O.
Affiliations
Jena University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Weingärtner, Oliver
Venue
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2023-01-05
Volume
112
Issue
9
Pages
1212-1219
ISSN
  • 1861-0684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-0692
OpenAlex
W4313545259
Cited by
52
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
ST-elevation myocardial infarction, intensive lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol targets, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors, dyslipidemia, statin adverse effects, very high-risk patients
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Ezetimibe, Proprotein Convertase 9, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Anticholesteremic Agents, Dicarboxylic Acids, Fatty Acids, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review