Cited by 30Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisInflammatory Bowel Disease

Analysis of gluten immunogenic peptides in feces to assess adherence to the gluten-free diet in pediatric celiac patients

Roca, María, Donat, Ester, Masip, Etna, Crespo-Escobar, Paula, Cañada-Martínez, Antonio José, Polo, Begoña, Ribes-Koninckx, Carmen·2021·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose In celiac disease (CD) there is a need for precise and non-invasive tools to assess dietary compliance to the gluten-free diet (GFD). Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the detection of gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) in feces, to monitor in real life, the adherence to GFD in pediatric patients with CD. Methods A cross-sectional, prospective study was conducted. Fecal samples from CD children were analyzed by a rapid immunochromatographic (IC) test and by an ELISA method, both based on the antigliadin 33-mer monoclonal antibody. Results Group 1 comprises 43 children on a GFD. According to the food records (FR), 39/43 patients were compliant with the GFD and gluten consumption was recorded in 4. GIP were detected in 15/43 individuals by the ELISA method and also in 7 by IC strips. Group 2: comprise 18 children at CD diagnosis; GIP levels decreased over time (p Conclusion GIP were detected, both by ELISA and by IC strips, in CD patients on a GFD, in which no consumption of gluten had been registered on the FR, confirming GIP detection to be superior to FR discovering involuntary transgressions. Despite a positive correlation between the amount of gluten intake and the concentration of GIP in feces, the interindividual variations observed suggest gastrointestinal factors influencing GIP recovery need to be further investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-020-02404-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roca, M., Donat, E., Masip, E., Crespo-Escobar, P., Cañada-Martínez, A. J., Polo, B., & Ribes-Koninckx, C.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES)
  • Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES)
Corresponding author
Roca, María
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
2131-2140
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W3093427357
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coeliac Disease & Gluten Sensitivity Association Madrid, Spain
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, gluten immunogenic peptides, fecal biomarkers, pediatric patients, lateral flow immunoassay, food diary, gluten intake
MeSH terms
Celiac Disease, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feces, Glutens, Humans, Patient Compliance, Peptides, Prospective Studies, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review