Relevanz der Magnetresonanztomographie für die Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern
Abstract
Currently, atrial fibrillation is the most common form of arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Until recently the treatment approach to atrial fibrillation was limited by imprecise risk stratification models and suboptimal therapy options. At present cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important noninvasive diagnostic modality which aids in the completion of complex electrophysiological and ablation interventions. Cardiac MRI and 3D imaging reconstruction are used clinically to assess the cardiac chambers as well as complex anatomical structures. Through the development of cardiac MRI it has become possible to detect areas of fibrosis in the left atrium which can be the cause of atrial fibrillation. The most recent clinical data suggest that there is a strong correlation between the amount of left atrial fibrosis and recurrent atrial fibrillation following ablation procedures and will in the future allow more individualized treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, cardiac MRI allows the direct visualization of catheter-induced lesions after ablation procedures which helps in assessing therapy success and can also assist in the early detection of procedure-related complications. Furthermore, with the implementation of cardiac MRI it appears possible to assess the stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Promising future developments will allow individualized therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation in addition to improving safety and procedure results after ablation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, and intracardiac echo may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.
“Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, [345][346][347] T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, 347 and intracardiac echo 348 may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [345]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Mahnkopf, C., Mitlacher, M., & Brachmann, J.
- Affiliations
- Klinikum Coburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mahnkopf, Christan
- ORCID
- Brachmann, Johannes
- Venue
- Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 252-257
- ISSN
- 0938-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-1544
- OpenAlex
- W162778228
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, catheter ablation, left atrial fibrosis, atrial fibrillation recurrence, stroke risk assessment, risk stratification, 3D cardiac imaging
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Preoperative Care, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Evidence-Based Medicine, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review