Cited by 3Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Relevanz der Magnetresonanztomographie für die Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern

Mahnkopf, Christan, Mitlacher, Marcel, Brachmann, Johannes·2014·Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie

Abstract

Currently, atrial fibrillation is the most common form of arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Until recently the treatment approach to atrial fibrillation was limited by imprecise risk stratification models and suboptimal therapy options. At present cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important noninvasive diagnostic modality which aids in the completion of complex electrophysiological and ablation interventions. Cardiac MRI and 3D imaging reconstruction are used clinically to assess the cardiac chambers as well as complex anatomical structures. Through the development of cardiac MRI it has become possible to detect areas of fibrosis in the left atrium which can be the cause of atrial fibrillation. The most recent clinical data suggest that there is a strong correlation between the amount of left atrial fibrosis and recurrent atrial fibrillation following ablation procedures and will in the future allow more individualized treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, cardiac MRI allows the direct visualization of catheter-induced lesions after ablation procedures which helps in assessing therapy success and can also assist in the early detection of procedure-related complications. Furthermore, with the implementation of cardiac MRI it appears possible to assess the stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Promising future developments will allow individualized therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation in addition to improving safety and procedure results after ablation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00399-014-0327-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, and intracardiac echo may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.

    “Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, [345][346][347] T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, 347 and intracardiac echo 348 may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 3

Authors
Mahnkopf, C., Mitlacher, M., & Brachmann, J.
Affiliations
Klinikum Coburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Mahnkopf, Christan
Venue
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie
Published
2014-08-27
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
252-257
ISSN
  • 0938-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1544
OpenAlex
W162778228
Cited by
3
References
23
Citations by year
2016: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, catheter ablation, left atrial fibrosis, atrial fibrillation recurrence, stroke risk assessment, risk stratification, 3D cardiac imaging
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Preoperative Care, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Evidence-Based Medicine, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review