Cited by 188Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Alzheimer’s disease pathology influences severity and topographical distribution of cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Open access
Attems, Johannes, Jellinger, Kurt A., Lintner, Felix·2005·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is defined by beta-amyloid peptide (Abeta) depositions in cerebral vessels and is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The relationship between sporadic CAA and AD, and the origin of Abeta in CAA are poorly understood. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between CAA and AD. Autopsy brains (n=113, 61.1% female, 55.8% clinically demented, age range 54-102 years, mean +/- SE 83.5+/-0.93 years) underwent standardized neuropathological assessment. CAA was evaluated in frontal, frontobasal, hippocampal, and occipital regions. Using immunohistochemistry, the severity of Abeta deposition in vessels was assessed semiquantitatively for each region separately. Evaluation of APOE genotype in 53 cases using real-time PCR showed significant correlations with severe AD pathology and CAA. CAA was present in 77 cases (68.1%), with the occipital region being affected significantly more often and more severely than other regions (P<0.01). Of brains without AD pathology 23.5% revealed CAA, whereas 24% with AD pathology showed no CAA. In concordance with other studies, the severity of both AD pathology and CAA showed a low, but significant correlation. This correlation, however, was only caused by the significant increase of occipital CAA with increasing AD pathology (P<0.01), and was independent of APOE genotype. Our results suggest that progressing AD pathology not only increases the severity of CAA, but also shifts its topographical distribution towards the occipital cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-005-1064-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 188

Authors
Attems, J., Jellinger, K. A., & Lintner, F.
Affiliations
Otto Wagner Hospital (AT)
Corresponding author
Jellinger, Kurt A.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2005-08-25
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
222-231
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2045508263
Cited by
188
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta deposition, APOE genotype, topographic distribution, occipital cortex, disease severity, neuropathology, vascular amyloidosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Cerebral Arteries, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Occipital Lobe, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Disease Progression, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review