Cited by 519Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdvanced Glycation End Products researchBarrier Structure and Function Studies

RAGE, LRP-1, and amyloid-beta protein in Alzheimer’s disease

Donahue, John E., Flaherty, Stephanie L., Johanson, Conrad E., Duncan, John A., Silverberg, Gerald D., Miller, Miles C., Tavares, Rosemarie, Yang, Wentian +4 more·2006·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is thought to be a primary transporter of beta-amyloid across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the brain from the systemic circulation, while the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)-1 mediates transport of beta-amyloid out of the brain. To determine whether there are Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related changes in these BBB-associated beta-amyloid receptors, we studied RAGE, LRP-1, and beta-amyloid in human elderly control and AD hippocampi. In control hippocampi, there was robust RAGE immunoreactivity in neurons, whereas microvascular staining was barely detectable. LRP-1 staining, in contrast, was clearly evident within microvessels but only weakly stained neurons. In AD cases, neuronal RAGE immunoreactivity was significantly decreased. An unexpected finding was the strongly positive microvascular RAGE immunoreactivity. No evidence for colocalization of RAGE and beta-amyloid was seen within either microvessels or senile plaques. A reversed pattern was evident for LRP-1 in AD. There was very strong staining for LRP-1 in neurons, with minimal microvascular staining. Unlike RAGE, colocalization of LRP-1 and beta-amyloid was clearly present within senile plaques but not microvessels. Western blot analysis revealed a much higher concentration of RAGE protein in AD hippocampi as compared with controls. Concentration of LRP-1 was increased in AD hippocampi, likely secondary to its colocalization with senile p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-006-0115-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LRP1 levels at the blood-brain barrier are diminished in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease models, contributing to Aβ accumulation in the brain.

    “LRP1 levels at the BBB are diminished in AD and AD models contributing to A 𝛃 accumulation in the brain (137, 152, 410, 535).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [152]

  • RAGE expression at the blood-brain barrier is increased in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease models.

    “Its expression at the BBB is increased in AD and AD models (134, 152, 410).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [152]

  • In Alzheimer's disease, brain microvessels exhibit reduced levels of LRP1, a major amyloid-beta clearance receptor at the blood-brain barrier.

    “AD brain microvessels also exhibit reduced levels of LRP1, a major A 𝛃 clearance receptor at the BBB (137, 152, 230, 410, 535).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [152]

  • RAGE expression is increased in Alzheimer's disease brain endothelium and mural cells.

    “In contrast to LRP1, expression of RAGE, a major A 𝛃 influx receptor, is increased in AD brain endothelium and mural cells (134, 152, 410)”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [152]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 519

Authors
Donahue, J. E., Flaherty, S. L., Johanson, C. E., Duncan, J. A., Silverberg, G. D., Miller, M. C., Tavares, R., Yang, W., Wu, Q., Sabo, E., Hovanesian, V., & Stopa, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Donahue, John E.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2006-07-25
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
405-415
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2091910339
Cited by
519
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 31
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH068855)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, receptor for advanced glycation end products, LRP1, low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, amyloid-beta, blood-brain barrier, hippocampus, amyloid plaques, microvessels
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Neurons, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review