White matter lesions in the brain with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease: TDP-43-immunopositive inclusions co-localize with p62, but not ubiquitin
Abstract
Recently, TDP-43 was established as a major component of the ubiquitinated inclusions found in both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease (FTLD-MND). However, differences in the underlying pathogenesis between ALS and FTLD-MND remain yet to be elucidated. Originally, TDP-43-immunopositive inclusions were found in neuronal cells and reported to be ubiquitinated. This study shows that TDP-43-positive inclusions were distributed throughout the subcortical white matter except for the occipital lobe in the FTLD-MND brain, but not in the ALS brain. TDP-43-positive inclusions were also prominent features of pathologically proven FTLD-MND cases (p-FTLD-MND) without history of apparent clinical cognitive decline. A substantial fraction of these inclusions was also p62-immunoreactive, and another noteworthy feature was that those inclusions did not stain positively for ubiquitin. Significant correlations between immunoreactivity for TDP-43 and p62 were observed, particularly in p-FTLD-MND (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.976). Furthermore, TDP-43 extracted from white matter appeared to be uncleaved. These results indicate that pathological changes might take place within the white matter also in the brain with FTLD-MND, but in a different manner than within the gray matter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SQSTM1-positive inclusions are found in the majority of patients with ALS and FTD and often overlap with inclusions that stain for ubiquitin and TARDBP/TDP-43.
“Furthermore, SQSTM1-positive inclusions are found in the majority of patients with ALS and FTD, and often overlap with inclusions that stain for ubiquitin and TARDBP/TDP-43 (TAR DNA binding protein), an essential RNA-binding protein integrally connected with ALS-FTD [82,116–118] (Figure 1).”
From Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [117]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Hiji, M., Takahashi, T., Fukuba, H., Yamashita, H., Kohriyama, T., & Matsumoto, M.
- Affiliations
- Hiroshima University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takahashi, Tetsuya
- Venue
- Acta Neuropathologica
- Published
- 2008-06-27
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-191
- ISSN
- 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0533
- OpenAlex
- W2036281288
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- TDP-43, p62, ubiquitin, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, white matter lesions, ubiquitinated inclusions, subcortical white matter, protein aggregation
- MeSH terms
- Sequestosome-1 Protein, Aged, Brain, Inclusion Bodies, Dementia, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Blotting, Western, Motor Neuron Disease, Microscopy, Confocal, Ubiquitin, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review