Cited by 60Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of dementing disorders: routes out of the swamp?

Jellinger, Kurt A.·2009·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

There are several consensus criteria for both the clinical and neuropathological diagnosis of different types of dementias. The clinical diagnostic accuracy using revised research criteria and newly developed biomarkers (MRI, PET, CSF analysis, genetic markers) ranges from 65 to 96% (for Alzheimer disease) with a specificity of diagnostic criteria versus other dementias of 23-88%. Neuropathological assessment of dementing disorders using immunohistochemistry, molecular biologic and genetic methods can achieve a diagnosis/classification, based on the homogeneous definitions, harmonized inter-laboratory methods and standards for the assessment of nervous system lesions, in about 99%, without, however, being able to clarify the causes/etiology of most of these disorders. Further prospective and concerted clinicopathological studies using revised methodological and validated protocols and uniform techniques are required to establish the nature, distribution pattern and grades of lesions and; thus, to overcome the limitations of the current diagnostic framework. By data fusion this my allow their more uniform application and correlation with the clinical data in order to approach a diagnostic "gold standard", and to create generally accepted criteria for differentiating cognitive disorders from healthy brain aging. The detection of disease-specific pathologies will be indispensable to determinate the efficacy of new therapy options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-008-0466-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 262 · Cited by 60

Authors
Jellinger, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Jellinger, Kurt A.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2008-12-04
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2022336636
Cited by
60
References
262
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dementia, neuropathological diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, Alzheimer's disease, clinicopathological correlation, healthy brain aging, biomarkers, data fusion, diagnostic gold standard
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Lysosomes, Peptides, Prions, tau Proteins, Trinucleotide Repeats, alpha-Synuclein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review