Cited by 94Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Pre- and post-synaptic cortical cholinergic deficits are proportional to amyloid plaque presence and density at preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Potter, Pamela E., Rauschkolb, Paula K., Pandya, Yoga, Sue, Lucia I., Sabbagh, Marwan N., Walker, Douglas G., Beach, Thomas G.·2011·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Amyloid imaging has identified cognitively normal older people with plaques as a group possibly at increased risk for developing Alzheimer's disease-related dementia. It is important to begin to thoroughly characterize this group so that preventative therapies might be tested. Existing cholinotropic agents are a logical choice for preventative therapy as experimental evidence suggests that they are anti-amyloidogenic and clinical trials have shown that they delay progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia. A detailed understanding of the status of the cortical cholinergic system in preclinical AD is still lacking, however. For more than 30 years, depletion of the cortical cholinergic system has been known to be one of the characteristic features of AD. Reports to date have suggested that some cholinergic markers are altered prior to cognitive impairment while others may show changes only at later stages of dementia. These studies have generally been limited by relatively small sample sizes, long postmortem intervals and insufficient definition of control and AD subjects by the defining histopathology. We, therefore, examined pre- and post-synaptic elements of the cortical cholinergic system in frontal and parietal cortex in 87 deceased subjects, including non-demented elderly with and without amyloid plaques as well as demented persons with neuropathologically confirmed AD. Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity was used as a presynaptic marker while displacement of (3)H-pirenzepine binding by oxotremorine-M in the presence and absence of GppNHp was used to assess postsynaptic M1 receptor coupling. The results indicate that cortical ChAT activity as well as M1 receptor coupling are both significantly decreased in non-demented elderly subjects with amyloid plaques and are more pronounced in subjects with AD and dementia. These findings confirm that cortical cholinergic dysfunction in AD begins at the preclinical stage of disease and suggest that cholinotropic agents currently used for AD treatment are a logical choice for preventative therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-011-0831-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In AD, Aβ oligomers interrupt neuronal activity resulting in synaptic dysfunction and eventually lead to cognitive decline.

    “In AD, these oligomers interrupt neuronal activity resulting in synaptic dysfunction and eventually lead to cognitive decline [5–10].”

    From Amyloid-β interrupts canonical Sonic hedgehog signaling by distorting primary cilia structure (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion reports that cortical amyloid plaques are associated with pre- and post-synaptic cholinergic abnormalities, including in non-demented subjects. It does not establish that Aβ oligomers interrupt neuronal activity or that this mechanism leads to cognitive decline; the study concerns plaques and cholinergic deficits, not that causal sequence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 94

Authors
Potter, P. E., Rauschkolb, P. K., Pandya, Y., Sue, L. I., Sabbagh, M. N., Walker, D. G., & Beach, T. G.
Affiliations
  • Midwestern University (US)
  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Potter, Pamela E.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2027585017
Cited by
94
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30-AG-19610, P30AG019610)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, choline acetyltransferase, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Cerebral Cortex, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Dementia, Humans, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Synapses, Case-Control Studies, GTP-Binding Proteins, Receptor, Muscarinic M1, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review