Commensal gut flora and brain autoimmunity: a love or hate affair?
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and other chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases represent major public health challenges in industrialised Western society. MS results from an autoimmune attack against myelin structures by self-reactive lymphocytes, which are normal components of the healthy immune repertoire. The nature of the triggers that convert the innocuous self-reactive lymphocytes into an autoaggressive phenotype is poorly understood. In the past, it was primarily suspected that pathogenic infections trigger MS. However, so far, none of the incriminated pathogenic microbes were firmly associated with the disease. A growing body of evidence in animal models of MS implicates the gut microbiota in the induction of central nervous system (CNS) autoimmunity. The mammalian gut harbors a diverse population of microbial organisms which are essential for our well being. There is an increasing understanding that the gut microbiota not only modulates the local immune functions but also affects the systemic immune system. We are only just beginning to understand the nature of the interactions of the gut microbiota with the host's immune system especially in the context of autoimmune diseases. This review will address the influence of intestinal microbiota on immune homeostasis and on the development of autoimmune responses at sites distal to the intestine with a particular emphasis placed on a discussion about CNS autoimmunity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is presently little evidence for a link between the gut microbiome, the adaptive immune system, specific autoimmunity, and disorders of the CNS in humans.
“Although this is an area of ongoing investigation, there is presently little evidence for a link between the gut microbiome, the adaptive immune system, specific autoimmunity, and disorders of the CNS in humans.43,44”
From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Berer, K., & Krishnamoorthy, G.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Krishnamoorthy, Gurumoorthy
- Venue
- Acta Neuropathologica
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 639-651
- ISSN
- 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0533
- OpenAlex
- W2038586441
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, multiple sclerosis, central nervous system autoimmunity, immune homeostasis, autoimmune disease triggers, myelin autoimmunity, commensal microorganisms, animal models of multiple sclerosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autoimmune Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review