Cited by 208Bacterial Infections and VaccinesNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsEscherichia coli research studies

Host–pathogen interactions in bacterial meningitis.

Open access
Doran, Kelly S., Fulde, Marcus, Gratz, Nina, Kim, Brandon J., Nau, Roland, Prasadarao, Nemani, Schubert-Unkmeir, Alexandra, Tuomanen, Elaine I. +1 more·2016·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Bacterial meningitis is a devastating disease occurring worldwide with up to half of the survivors left with permanent neurological sequelae. Due to intrinsic properties of the meningeal pathogens and the host responses they induce, infection can cause relatively specific lesions and clinical syndromes that result from interference with the function of the affected nervous system tissue. Pathogenesis is based on complex host-pathogen interactions, some of which are specific for certain bacteria, whereas others are shared among different pathogens. In this review, we summarize the recent progress made in understanding the molecular and cellular events involved in these interactions. We focus on selected major pathogens, Streptococcus pneumonia, S. agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), Neisseria meningitidis, and Escherichia coli K1, and also include a neglected zoonotic pathogen, Streptococcus suis. These neuroinvasive pathogens represent common themes of host-pathogen interactions, such as colonization and invasion of mucosal barriers, survival in the blood stream, entry into the central nervous system by translocation of the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and induction of meningeal inflammation, affecting pia mater, the arachnoid and subarachnoid spaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-015-1531-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNS inflammation and disruption of the BBB results in CNS tissue damage through apoptotic neuronal injury, oedema, microvascular thrombosis and raised intracranial pressure.

    “CNS inflammation and disruption of the BBB results in CNS tissue damage through apoptotic neuronal injury, oedema, microvascular thrombosis and raised intracranial pressure.26”
  • In cases of bacterial meningitis, infections usually start as skin, gastrointestinal or respiratory infections that spread to the blood, and bacteria accumulate in the leptomeningeal vasculature and move into the meninges by inducing BBB breakdown.

    “In cases of bacterial meningitis, infections usually start as skin, gastrointestinal or respiratory infections that spread to the blood”

    From Living on the Edge of the CNS: Meninges Cell Diversity in Health and Disease (2021) · cites this paper as Doran et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 165 · Cited by 208

Authors
Doran, K. S., Fulde, M., Gratz, N., Kim, B. J., Nau, R., Prasadarao, N., Schubert-Unkmeir, A., Tuomanen, E. I., & Valentin-Weigand, P.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
131
Issue
2
Pages
185-209
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2228954012
Cited by
208
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Niedersachsen-Research Network on Neuroinfectiology (N-RENNT) of the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony, Germany
  • NIH/NINDS (RO1NS051247)
  • National Institutes of Health (AI40567, NS73115, HD41525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, host-pathogen interaction, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Neisseria meningitidis, Escherichia coli K1, Streptococcus suis, meningeal inflammation, blood-brain barrier, blood-CSF barrier, translocation, mucosal colonization, pia mater, arachnoid, subarachnoid space, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Meningitis, Bacterial, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review