Proteomic differences in amyloid plaques in rapidly progressive and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease (rpAD) is a particularly aggressive form of Alzheimer's disease, with a median survival time of 7-10 months after diagnosis. Why these patients have such a rapid progression of Alzheimer's disease is currently unknown. To further understand pathological differences between rpAD and typical sporadic Alzheimer's disease (sAD) we used localized proteomics to analyze the protein differences in amyloid plaques in rpAD and sAD. Label-free quantitative LC-MS/MS was performed on amyloid plaques microdissected from rpAD and sAD patients (n = 22 for each patient group) and protein expression differences were quantified. On average, 913 ± 30 (mean ± SEM) proteins were quantified in plaques from each patient and 279 of these proteins were consistently found in plaques from every patient. We found significant differences in protein composition between rpAD and sAD plaques. We found that rpAD plaques contained significantly higher levels of neuronal proteins (p = 0.0017) and significantly lower levels of astrocytic proteins (p = 1.08 × 10-6). Unexpectedly, cumulative protein differences in rpAD plaques did not suggest accelerated typical sAD. Plaques from patients with rpAD were particularly abundant in synaptic proteins, especially those involved in synaptic vesicle release, highlighting the potential importance of synaptic dysfunction in the accelerated development of plaque pathology in rpAD. Combined, our data provide new direct evidence that amyloid plaques do not all have the same protein composition and that the proteomic differences in plaques could provide important insight into the factors that contribute to plaque development. The cumulative protein differences in rpAD plaques suggest rpAD may be a novel subtype of Alzheimer's disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a prior proteomic study, 7 out of the top 10 plaque-associated proteins most significantly decreased in rapidly-progressive Alzheimer's disease are found in the M4 module, including hubs MSN and PLEC.
“Notably, when we compare our findings to a prior proteomic study that quantified levels of plaque-associated proteins in normal versus rapidly-progressive AD45, 7 out of the top 10 plaque-associated proteins most significantly decreased in rapidly-progressive AD are found in the M4 module, including M4 hubs MSN and PLEC.”
A failure to activate the MSN module may lead to more aggressive cognitive decline.
“suggesting that a failure to activate this module may lead to more aggressive cognitive decline [96, 126].”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [126]
Several MSN module proteins are decreased in rapidly progressive AD compared to sporadic disease.
“the authors also found several of these module proteins are decreased in rapidly progressive AD compared to sporadic disease”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [126]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 239
- Authors
- Drummond, E., Nayak, S., Faustin, A., Pires, G., Hickman, R. A., Askenazi, M., Cohen, M., Haldiman, T., Kim, C., Han, X., Shao, Y., Safar, J. G., Ueberheide, B., & Wisniewski, T.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Drummond, Eleanor
- ORCID
- Venue
- Acta Neuropathologica
- Published
- 2017-03-04
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 933-954
- ISSN
- 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0533
- PMC
- PMC5503748
- OpenAlex
- W2593979775
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AG08051, NS073502)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- sporadic Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, neuronal proteins, synaptic proteins, synaptic vesicle release, synaptic dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease subtypes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Astrocytes, Brain, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Neurites, Disease Progression, Microscopy, Confocal, Proteome, Proteomics, Microdissection, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review