The association between alopecia areata and anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder: a population-based study
Abstract
Although Alopecia areata (AA) has been found to be associated with psychological distress, the scope and nature of this association has not been fully delineated. The current study sought to examine the association of AA with anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, utilizing a large-scale matched controlled cohort design. Patients suffering from AA (n = 41,055) were matched to control cases (n = 41,055) by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). The prevalence of the four major mental disorders was assessed while stratifying the sample by age and sex, and after adjusting for marital status, smoking, BMI, hypertension, and diabetes. Data were accessed via the Clalit Health Services (CHS) database, a comprehensive health registry utilized by the largest managed healthcare company in Israel. Anxiety was independently and positively associated with AA (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13-1.31, p < 0.001), across all age groups above 30, with similar rates in males and females. Depression was also independently and positively associated with AA (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p < 0.005), particularly in the 30-49 age group, with a higher association among females. A negative association was found between AA and schizophrenia (OR 0. 71, 95% CI 0.61-0.83, p < 0.001). No association was found between AA and bipolar disease. Patients with AA are at risk for anxiety and depression, with female patients, and patients in the 30-49 age group being particularly vulnerable to develop a co-occurring mental disorder. Medical treatment should therefore include psychiatric evaluation and appropriate care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Samples of individuals with visible differences commonly show significantly higher rates of appearance-based anxiety and depression across cultures compared with matched controls.
“Although many adjust well to having a visible difference, samples of individuals with visible differences commonly show significantly higher rates of appearance-based anxiety and depression across cultures (eg, in adults with acne [7] and alopecia [8]) when compared with matched controls.”
From An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Prototype Mobile Program for Individuals with a Visible Difference: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Tzur Bitan, D., Berzin, D., Kridin, K., & Cohen, A.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatological Research
- Published
- 2021-06-05
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 463-468
- ISSN
- 0003-9187 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-069X
- OpenAlex
- W3165631715
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Dermatological Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer (55988381)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- alopecia areata, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, mental illness, psychological distress, sex differences, age differences, psychiatric comorbidity, autoimmune hair loss
- MeSH terms
- Alopecia Areata, Anxiety, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Schizophrenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review