Performance of peripheral (serum and molecular) blood markers for diagnosis of endometriosis
Abstract
Purpose To quantify the mRNA levels of MMP-3, MMP-9, VEGF and Survivin in peripheral blood and the serum levels of CA-125 and Ca19-9 in women with and without endometriosis and to investigate the performance of these markers to differentiate between deep and ovarian endometriosis.Methods A case control study enrolled a series of 60 patients. Twenty controls have been matched with 20 cases of ovarian and 20 cases of deep endometriosis. Univariable and multivariable performance of serum CA125 and CA19-9, mRNA for Survivin, MMP9, MMP3 and VEGF genes have been evaluated by means of ROC curves and logistic regression, respectively.Results No difference in markers' concentration was detected between ovarian and deep endometriosis. In comparison with controls, serum CA125 and CA19 yielded the better sensitivity followed by mRNA for Survivin gene (81.5, 51.9 and 7.5% at 10% false positive rate, respectively). Multivariable estimated odds of endometriosis yielded a sensitivity of 87% at the same false positive rate.Conclusions A combination of serum and molecular markers could allow a better diagnosis of endometriosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of CA-125, CA-19-9, and survivin mRNA showed promise, with sensitivity of 87% and a 10% false positive rate.
“The combination of CA-125, CA-19-9, and survivin mRNA showed promise, boasting a sensitivity of 87% and a 10% false positive rate [33].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Mabrouk, M., Elmakky, A., Caramelli, E., Farina, A., Mignemi, G., Venturoli, S., Villa, G., Guerrini, M., Manuzzi, L., Montanari, G., De Sanctis, P., Valvassori, L., Zucchini, C., & Seracchioli, R.
- Affiliations
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Seracchioli, Renato
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Published
- 2011-11-08
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1307-1312
- ISSN
- 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
- 0932-0067
- 1432-0711
- OpenAlex
- W2127532993
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, endometrioma, serum biomarkers, CA125, CA19-9, MMP-3, MMP-9, vascular endothelial growth factor, survivin, mRNA expression, diagnostic sensitivity, combination biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Survivin, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, ROC Curve, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, CA-125 Antigen, CA-19-9 Antigen, Matrix Metalloproteinase 3, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review