Cited by 66Ovarian function and disordersPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A systematic review of GLP-1 agonists on the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovaries

Niafar, Mitra, Pourafkari, Leili, Porhomayon, Jahan, Nader, Nader·2016·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose Glucagon-like peptides receptor agonists are currently approved as anti-obesity agents, yet the experience with their use in polycystic ovarian syndromes (PCOS)-related obesity and insulin resistance is still limited.Methods We examined the effects of liraglutide on obesity, insulin resistance, and androgen levels in PCOS through a meta-analysis.Results Seven RCTs where women with PCOS were treated with liraglutide were identified. The variables that were examined before and after a 90-day treatment included waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), fasting insulin concentrations, insulin resistance using homeostatic model (HOMA-IR), serum testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). The analysis included 178 women. Only 172 patients had post-treatment measurements. While BMI significantly dropped by -1.65 (0.72-2.58) Kg/m(2) after 3 months treatment with liraglutide, waist circumference did not change significantly. Similarly, fasting insulin levels, insulin sensitivity, and SHBG did not change significantly. However, serum testosterone decreased by 0.29 nmol/L in 88 women (P = 0.0003).Conclusion In a limited number of the women with PCOS, BMI and serum testosterone are only variables that significantly decrease after 3 months of treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists. Larger sample size studies with longer durations of treatment may be required to examine potential benefits of these medications in improving insulin sensitivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-015-3976-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 66

Authors
Niafar, M., Pourafkari, L., Porhomayon, J., & Nader, N.
Affiliations
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Nader, Nader
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2015-12-10
Volume
293
Issue
3
Pages
509-515
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2217459290
Cited by
66
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide, polycystic ovary syndrome, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, obesity, androgen levels, testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting insulin
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Androgens, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review