CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Major and minor complications after anterior rectal resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis

Renner, Stefan P., Kessler, Hermann, Topal, Nalan, Proske, Kim, Adler, Werner, Burghaus, Stefanie, Haupt, Werner, Beckmann, Matthias W., Lermann, Johannes·2017·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
DOI 10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the present study was to analyze major and minor complications-including long-term impairment of intestinal, bladder, and sexual function-following surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis using anterior rectal resection. Methods Patients who had undergone anterior rectal resection due to endometriosis between 2001 and 2011 were included (n = 113). Clinical and surgical data, as well as minor and major complications, were recorded. A questionnaire was sent to the patients and also to a healthy control group (n = 100). Results Major complications occurred in 15.9% of cases and minor complications in 15%. Patients with postoperative ileostomies (n = 8) initially had ultralow anastomoses significantly more often. The questionnaire response rate was 77%, with a mean follow-up period of 85.9 months. Weak urinary flow was reported by 22.4% of the patients: a feeling of residual urine by 18.4%; more than one bowel movement/day by 57.5%; and insufficient lubrication during intercourse by 36.5%. These results differed significantly from the control group. Subgroup analysis showed no statistical associations between questionnaire responses and major or minor complications, ultralow anastomoses, bilateral dissection of the sacrouterine ligaments, or dissection of the vagina and rectovaginal space. Conclusions The major complication rate was consistent with the literature, but there were fewer minor complications. Patients with bowel anastomoses below 6 cm (ultral…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study evaluating 113 colorectal resections, all patients with rectovaginal fistula (4.4%) had undergone intraoperative excision of endometriotic lesions of the vagina.

    “In this regard, Renner et al. [20] in a study evaluating 113 colorectal resections showed that all patients with rectovaginal fistula (4.4%) had undergone intraoperative excision of endometriotic lesions of the vagina.”

    From Post-operative complications and recurrence rate after treatment of bowel endometriosis: Comparison of three techniques (2019) · cites this paper as Renner et al. [20]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Kandolf O, Wiesinger H, Wustlich M (2003) Laparoscopic therapy of intestinal endometriosis and the ranking of drug treatment. Zentralbl Gynakol 125:259–266. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42281 · DOI
  2. Mohr C, Nezhat FR, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR (2005) Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. JSLS 9:16–24
  3. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hooghe T (2011) Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update 17:311–326. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq057 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Keckstein J, Wiesinger H (2005) Deep endometriosis, including intestinal involvement—the interdisciplinary approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:160–166. doi: 10.1080/14017430510035916 · DOI
  5. Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc 24:63–67. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0517-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tarjanne S, Heikinheimo O, Mentula M, Härkki P (2015) Complications and long-term follow-up on colorectal resections in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis extending to bowel wall. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:72–79. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12515 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zilberman S, Ballester M, Touboul C, Chéreau E, Sèbe P, Bazot M, Daraï E (2013) Partial colpectomy is a risk factor for urologic complications of colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.775 · DOI
  8. Dousset B, Leconte M, Borghese B, Millischer AE, Roseau G, Arkwright S, Chapron C (2010) Complete surgery for low rectal endometriosis: long-term results of a 100-case prospective study. Ann Surg 251:887–895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9722d · DOI
  9. Dubernard G, Rouzier R, David-Montefiore E, Bazot M, Daraï E (2008) Urinary complications after surgery for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis are related to the extent of dissection and to uterosacral ligaments resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.009 · DOI
  10. Koninckx PR, Martin D (1994) Treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 6:231–241 · DOI
  11. Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Possover M, Schweppe KW, Wustlich M, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Kandolf O, Mangold R, Masetti W, Neis K, Rauter G, Reeka N, Richter O, Schindler AE, Sillem M, Terruhn V, Tinneberg HR (2008) ENZIAN-Klassifikation zur Diskussion gestellt: Eine neue differenzierte Klassifikation der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose. J Gynäkol Endokrinol 18:7–13
  12. Baessler K, Junginger B (2011) Validation of a pelvic floor questionnaire with improvement and satisfaction scales to assess symptom severity, bothersomeness and quality of life before and after pelvic floor therapy. Aktuelle Urol 42:316–322. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271544 · DOI
  13. Baessler K, O’Neill SM, Maher CF, Battistutta D (2009) Australian pelvic floor questionnaire: a validated interviewer-administered pelvic floor questionnaire for routine clinic and research. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:149–158. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0742-4 · DOI
  14. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afde41 · DOI
  15. Gehrich A, Stany MP, Fischer JR, Buller J, Zahn CM (2007) Establishing a mean postvoid residual volume in asymptomatic perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 110:827–832. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000284445.68789.ee · DOI
  16. Burghaus S, Fehm T, Fasching PA, Blum S, Renner SK, Baier F, Brodkorb T, Fahlbusch C, Findeklee S, Häberle L, Heusinger K, Hildebrandt T, Lermann J, Strahl O, Tchartchian G, Bojahr B, Porn A, Fleisch M, Reicke S, Füger T, Hartung CP, Hackl J, Beckmann MW, Renner SP (2016) The international endometriosis evaluation program (IEEP Study)—a systematic study for physicians, researchers and patients. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76:875–881. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106895 · DOI
  17. Akladios C, Messori P, Faller E, Puga M, Afors K, Leroy J, Wattiez A (2015) Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.001 · DOI
  18. Minelli L, Ceccaroni M, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Pomini P, Pontrelli G, Rolla M, Scioscia M (2010) Laparoscopic conservative surgery for stage IV symptomatic endometriosis: short-term surgical complications. Fertil Steril 94:1218–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.035 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Scambia G, Minelli L (2010) Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 94:444–449. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.066 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Renner, S. P., Kessler, H., Topal, N., Proske, K., Adler, W., Burghaus, S., Haupt, W., Beckmann, M. W., & Lermann, J.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lermann, Johannes
ORCID
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
295
Issue
5
Pages
1277-1285
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
DOI
10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6
OpenAlex
W2604225122
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, anterior rectal resection, postoperative complications, urinary dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, long-term functional outcome
MeSH terms
Adult, Defecation, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Rectum, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Urinary Retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review