Cited by 56Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsCancer Risks and Factors

Impact of endometriosis on risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers: A meta-analysis

li, Jia, Liu, Ruijuan, Tang, Shifeng, Feng, Fubin, Liu, Cun, Wang, Lu, Zhao, Wenge, Zhang, Tingting +3 more·2019·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose The risks of gynecologic cancer have not been well established in women with endometriosis. The objective of the present study was to investigate the influence of endometriosis on the risk for three gynecologic cancer (ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer and cervical cancer).Methods We gathered updated evidence about the risk relationship between endometriosis and gynecologic cancers by conducting a comprehensive search of several medical literature electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The design and quality of all studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR).Results Of the 8538 articles our search produced, we selected 25 qualified studies, including 16 cohort studies and 9 case-control studies. Patients with endometriosis had both an increased risk of ovarian cancer [RR 1.964; 95% CI (1.685, 2.290)]. The risk of endometrial cancer (EC) is not necessarily higher in patients with endometriosis [RR 1.176, 95% CI (0.878, 1.575)]. Endometriosis was not associated with an increased risk for cervical cancer (CC) [RR 0.670, 95% CI (0.537, 0.838)].Conclusions Patients with endometriosis need to be closely observed and rechecked regularly to prevent malignant changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-018-4968-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 56

Authors
li, J., Liu, R., Tang, S., Feng, F., Liu, C., Wang, L., Zhao, W., Zhang, T., Yao, Y., Wang, X., & Sun, C.
Affiliations
  • Weifang Medical University (CN)
  • Weifang Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN)
  • Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Changgang
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
299
Issue
1
Pages
35-46
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2901646825
Cited by
56
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
endometriosis, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, gynecologic cancer risk, cancer risk association
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Endometrial Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review