Cited by 32Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsGynecological conditions and treatmentsHernia repair and management

Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: A systematic review

Open access
Schaefer, Sebastian D., Alkatout, Ibrahim, Dornhoefer, Nadja, Herrmann, Joerg, Klapdor, Ruediger, Meinhold-Heerlein, Ivo, Meszaros, Jozsef, Mustea, Alexander +3 more·2024·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Importance: The formation of adhesions after gynecological surgery not only has detrimental impacts on those affected, including pain, obstruction, and infertility, but also imposes a high economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Objective: The aim of this review was to evaluate the adhesion prevention potential of all currently available adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery. Evidence acquisition: We systematically searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adhesion barriers as compared with peritoneal irrigation or no treatment in gynecological surgery. Only RCTs with second-look surgery to evaluate adhesions in the pelvic/abdominal (but not intrauterine) cavity were included. Results: We included 45 RCTs with a total of 4,120 patients examining a total of 10 unique types of barriers in second-look gynecological surgery. While RCTs on oxidized regenerated cellulose (significant improvement in 6 of 14 trials), polyethylene glycol with/without other agents (4/10), hyaluronic acid and hyaluronate + carboxymethylcellulose (7/10), icodextrin (1/3), dextran (0/3), fibrin-containing agents (1/2), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (1/1), N,O-carboxymethylchitosan (0/1), and modified starch (1/1) overall showed inconsistent findings, results for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, and modified starch yielded the greatest improvements regarding adhesion reduction at 75%, 0–67%, and 85%, respectively. Conclusions and relevance: Best results for adhesion prevention were reported after applying Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane, hyaluronic acid, and 4DryField ® . As Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane is nonabsorbable, it is associated with a greater risk of new adhesion formation due to second-look surgery to remove the product. 4DryField ® yielded the greatest improvement in adhesion score compared to all other barrier agents (85%). For better comparability, future studies should use standardized scores and put more emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, such as pain and infertility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-024-07584-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.

    “Postoperative adhesions (POAs) are a common and often serious complication following abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, leading to infertility, chronic pain, and bowel obstruction.”
  • In gynecological surgery, adhesion formation often leads to chronic pelvic pain, bowel obstruction, and infertility.

    “In gynecological surgery, adhesion formation is of particular concern, as it often leads to chronic pelvic pain, bowel obstruction, and infertility [3].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. [1]Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion Fertil Steril 2013 99 6 1550 1555 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.031 23472951 · DOI
  2. [2]Brüggmann D Tchartchian G Wallwiener M Münstedt K Tinneberg HR Hackethal A Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options Deutsches Arzteblatt Int 2010 107 44 769 775 PMC2992017 21116396
  3. [3]Pados G Venetis CA Almaloglou K Tarlatzis BC Prevention of intra-peritoneal adhesions in gynaecological surgery: theory and evidence Reprod Biomed Online 2010 21 3 290 303 20688570
  4. [5]Liakakos T Thomakos N Fine PM Dervenis C Young RL Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management Dig Surgery. 2001 18 4 260 273 11528133
  5. [6]Krämer B Andress J Neis F Hoffmann S Brucker S Kommoss S Holler A Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery - results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021 406 6 2133 2143 34036409 PMC8481146
  6. [7]Somigliana E Benaglia L Vigano P Candiani M Vercellini P Fedele L Surgical measures for endometriosis-related infertility: a plea for research Placenta 2011 32 Suppl 3 S238 S242 21764126
  7. [8]Krämer B Neis F Brucker SY Kommoss S Andress J Hoffmann S Peritoneal adhesions and their prevention - current trends Surg Technol Int 2021 38 221 233 33503674
  8. [9]Binda MM Humidification during laparoscopic surgery: overview of the clinical benefits of using humidified gas during laparoscopic surgery Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015 292 5 955 971 25911545 PMC4744605
  9. [10]Tinelli A Malvasi A Guido M Tsin DA Hudelist G Hurst B Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier Fertil Steril 2011 95 5 1780 1785 21256483
  10. [11]Brochhausen C Schmitt VH Planck CN Rajab TK Hollemann D Tapprich C Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention J Gastrointest Surg 2012 16 6 1256 1274 22297658
  11. [13](1989) Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED(TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. INTERCEED(TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group. Fertility and sterility. 51(6):933–8 2524407
  12. [14](1995) The efficacy of Interceed(TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group. Fertil Steril. 63(4):709–14 7890052
  13. [15]Azziz R Microsurgery alone or with INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier for pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. The INTERCEED (TC7) adhesion barrier study group II Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 1993 177 2 135 139 8342092
  14. [16]Franklin RR Reduction of ovarian adhesions by the use of Interceed Ovarian Adhesion Study Group Obstet Gynecol 1995 86 3 335 340 7651638
  15. [17]Greenblatt EM Casper RF Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cautery for polycystic ovarian syndrome: lack of correlation with pregnancy rate Fertil Steril 1993 60 5 766 770 8224258
  16. [18]Keckstein J Ulrich U Sasse V Roth A Tuttlies F Karageorgieva E Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy Hum Reprod 1996 11 3 579 582 8671270
  17. [19]Li TC Cooke ID The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994 101 4 335 339 8199081
  18. [20]Mais V Ajossa S Marongiu D Peiretti RF Guerriero S Melis GB Reduction of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery: a randomized trial with an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier Obstet Gynecol 1995 86 4 Pt 1 512 515 7675371
  19. [21]Mais V Ajossa S Piras B Guerriero S Marongiu D Melis GB Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier Hum Reprod 1995 10 12 3133 3135 8822429
  20. [22]Saravelos H Li TC Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of Interceed to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study Hum Reprod 1996 11 5 992 997 8671376
  21. [23]Sawada T Nishizawa H Nishio E Kadowaki M Postoperative adhesion prevention with an oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier in infertile women J Reprod Med 2000 45 5 387 389 10845171
  22. [24]Sekiba K Use of Interceed(TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee Obstet Gynecol 1992 79 4 518 522 1553169
  23. [25]Wallwiener D Meyer A Bastert G Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers? Fertil Steril 1998 69 1 132 137 9457948
  24. [26]Canis MJ, Triopon G, Daraï E, Madelenat P, LeVêque J, Panel P, et al. (2014) Adhesion prevention after myomectomy by laparotomy: a prospective multicenter comparative randomized single-blind study with second-look laparoscopy to assess the effectiveness of PREVADH™. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reproductive Biol 178:42–7. 24841647
  25. [27]diZerega GS Coad J Donnez J Clinical evaluation of endometriosis and differential response to surgical therapy with and without application of Oxiplex/AP* adhesion barrier gel Fertil Steril 2007 87 3 485 489 17126335
  26. [28]Johns DA Ferland R Dunn R Initial feasibility study of a sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian surgery J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003 10 3 334 338 14567807
  27. [29]Lundorff P Donnez J Korell M Audebert AJ Block K diZerega GS Clinical evaluation of a viscoelastic gel for reduction of adhesions following gynaecological surgery by laparoscopy in Europe Hum Reprod 2005 20 2 514 520 15591082
  28. [30]Mettler L Audebert A Lehmann-Willenbrock E Schive-Peterhansl K Jacobs VR A randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy Fertil Steril 2004 82 2 398 404 15302290
  29. [31]Mettler L Hucke J Bojahr B Tinneberg H-R Leyland N Avelar R A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy† Hum Reprod 2008 23 5 1093 1100 18346996
  30. [32]Tchartchian G Hackethal A Herrmann A Bojahr B Wallwiener C Ohlinger R Evaluation of SprayShield™ adhesion barrier in a single center: randomized controlled study in 15 women undergoing reconstructive surgery after laparoscopic myomectomy Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014 290 4 697 704 24781718
  31. [33]Ten Broek RP Kok-Krant N Verhoeve HR van Goor H Bakkum EA Efficacy of polyethylene glycol adhesion barrier after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: results of a randomized controlled pilot study Gynecol Surg 2012 9 1 29 35 22408577 PMC3285763
  32. [34]Trew GH Pistofidis GA Brucker SY Krämer B Ziegler NM Korell M A first-in-human, randomized, controlled, subject- and reviewer-blinded multicenter study of Actamax™ adhesion barrier Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017 295 2 383 395 27844212 PMC5281664
  33. [35]Young P Johns A Templeman C Witz C Webster B Ferland R Reduction of postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic gynecological surgery with Oxiplex/AP Gel: a pilot study Fertil Steril 2005 84 5 1450 1456 16275243
  34. [36]Diamond MP Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group Fertil Steril 1996 66 6 904 910 8941053
  35. [37]Diamond MP Reduction of de novo postsurgical adhesions by intraoperative precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) solution: a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group Fertil Steril 1998 69 6 1067 1074 9627294
  36. [38]Fossum GT Silverberg KM Miller CE Diamond MP Holmdahl L Gynecologic use of sepraspray adhesion barrier for reduction of adhesion development after laparoscopic myomectomy: a pilot study Fertil Steril 2011 96 2 487 491 21718999
  37. [39]Johns DB Keyport GM Hoehler F diZerega GS Reduction of postsurgical adhesions with Intergel adhesion prevention solution: a multicenter study of safety and efficacy after conservative gynecologic surgery Fertil Steril 2001 76 3 595 604 11532487
  38. [40]Kiefer DG Muscat JC Santorelli J Chavez MR Ananth CV Smulian JC Vintzileos AM Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 214 3 373e1 e12 PMC4818004 26478104
  39. [41]Liu C Lu Q Zhang Z Xue M Zhang Y Zhang Y A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of a new crosslinked hyaluronan gel in reducing adhesions after gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015 22 5 853 863 25906706
  40. [42]Lundorff P van Geldorp H Tronstad SE Lalos O Larsson B Johns DB diZerega GS Reduction of post-surgical adhesions with ferric hyaluronate gel: a European study Hum Reprod 2001 16 9 1982 1988 11527909
  41. [43]Mais V Bracco GL Litta P Gargiulo T Melis GB Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study Hum Reprod 2006 21 5 1248 1254 16439505
  42. [44]Pellicano M Bramante S Cirillo D Palomba S Bifulco G Zullo F Nappi C Effectiveness of autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study Fertil Steril 2003 80 2 441 444 12909511
  43. [45]Thornton MH Johns DB Campeau JD Hoehler F DiZerega GS Clinical evaluation of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate adhesion prevention gel for the reduction of adhesions following peritoneal cavity surgery: open-label pilot study Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 1998 13 6 1480 5 9688376
  44. [46]Trew G Pistofidis G Pados G Lower A Mettler L Wallwiener D Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery Human Reprod (Oxford, England) 2011 26 8 2015 2027 21632697
  45. [47]Brown CB Luciano AA Martin D Peers E Scrimgeour A diZerega GS Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study Fertil Steril 2007 88 5 1413 1426 17383643
  46. [48]diZerega GS Verco SJ Young P Kettel M Kobak W Martin D A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery Hum Reprod 2002 17 4 1031 1038 11925401
  47. [49](1983) Reduction of postoperative pelvic adhesions with intraperitoneal 32% dextran 70: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Fertility Steril 40(5):612–9 6195021
  48. [50]Larsson B Lalos O Marsk L Tronstad SE Bygdeman M Pehrson S Joelsson I Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985 64 5 437 441 2414966
  49. [51]Rosenberg SM Board JA High-molecular weight dextran in human infertility surgery Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 148 4 380 385 6198914
  50. [52]Diamond MP Korell M Martinez S Kurman E Kamar M A prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter, exploratory pilot study evaluating the safety and potential trends in efficacy of Adhexil Fertil Steril 2011 95 3 1086 1090 21193191
  51. [53]Takeuchi H Kitade M Kikuchi I Shimanuki H Kumakiri J Kinoshita K Adhesion-prevention effects of fibrin sealants after laparoscopic myomectomy as determined by second-look laparoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study J Reprod Med 2005 50 8 571 577 16220761
  52. [54]Group TMAMS An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier (Gore-Tex surgical membrane) reduces post-myomectomy adhesion formation. The myomectomy adhesion multicenter study group Fertil Steril 1995 63 3 491 3 7851575
  53. [55]Diamond MP Luciano A Johns DA Dunn R Young P Bieber E Reduction of postoperative adhesions by N, O-carboxymethylchitosan: a pilot study Fertil Steril 2003 80 3 631 636 12969711
  54. [56]Rajab TK Kimonis KO Ali E Offodile AC Brady M Bleday R Practical implications of postoperative adhesions for preoperative consent and operative technique Int J Surg 2013 11 9 753 756 23962663
  55. [57]Pellicano M Guida M Bramante S Acunzo G Di Spiezio SA Tommaselli GA Nappi C Reproductive outcome after autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel application in infertile patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy Fertil Steril 2005 83 2 498 500 15705404
  56. [58]Krämer B Andress J Neis F Hoffmann S Brucker S Kommoss S Höller A Improvement in fertility and pain after endometriosis resection and adhesion prevention with 4DryField® PH: follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial J Clin Med 2023 12 10 3597 37240703 PMC10218949
  57. [59]Ellis H Harrison W Hugh TB The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions Br J Surg 1965 52 471 476 14296780
  58. [60]Hubbard TB Jr Khan MZ Carag VR Jr Albites VE Hricko GM The pathology of peritoneal repair: its relation to the formation of adhesions Ann Surg 1967 165 6 908 916 6026310 PMC1617552
  59. [61]Shapiro L Holste JL Muench T diZerega G Rapid reperitonealization and wound healing in a preclinical model of abdominal trauma repair with a composite mesh Int J Surg 2015 22 86 91 26166739
  60. [62]Ditzel M Deerenberg EB Komen N Mulder IM Jeekel H Lange JF Postoperative adhesion prevention with a new barrier: an experimental study Eur Surg Res 2012 48 4 187 193 22677977
  61. [63]Hwang HJ An MS Ha TK Kim KH Kim TH Choi CS All the commercially available adhesion barriers have the same effect on adhesion prophylaxis?; A comparison of barrier agents using a newly developed, severe intra-abdominal adhesion model Int J Colorectal Dis 2013 28 8 1117 1125 23588871
  62. [64]Klink CD Schickhaus P Binnebösel M Jockenhoevel S Rosch R Tolba R Neumann UP Klinge U Influence of 4% icodextrin solution on peritoneal tissue response and adhesion formation BMC Surg 2013 10.1186/1471-2482-13-34 24020840 PMC3846168 · DOI
  63. [65]Poehnert D Grethe L Maegel L Jonigk D Lippmann T Kaltenborn A Evaluation of the effectiveness of peritoneal adhesion prevention devices in a rat model Int J Med Sci 2016 13 7 524 532 27429589 PMC4946123
  64. [66]Müller SA Treutner KH Haase G Kinzel S Tietze L Schumpelick V Effect of intraperitoneal antiadhesive fluids in a rat peritonitis model Arch Surg 2003 138 3 286 290 12611576
  65. [67]Lee WS Baek JH Lee WK Direct comparison of Seprafilm (R) versus Adept (R) versus no additive for reducing the risk of small-bowel obstruction in colorectal cancer surgery Surg Today 2013 43 9 995 1002 23397254
  66. [68]Liu T-M Kiu K-T Yen M-H Tam K-W Chang T-C Efficacy and safety of purified starch for adhesion prevention in colorectal surgery Heliyon. 2023 9 11 e21657 38028006 PMC10656248
  67. [70]Haney AF Hesla J Hurst BS Kettel LM Murphy AA Rock JA Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) in preventing adhesions Fertil Steril 1995 63 5 1021 1026 7720911
  68. [71]Best CL Rittenhouse D Vasquez C Norng T Subias E Sueldo CE Evaluation of Interceed (TC7) for reduction of postoperative adhesions in rabbits Fertil Steril 1992 58 4 817 820 1426330
  69. [72]Pagidas K Tulandi T Effects of Ringer’s lactate, lnterceed(TC7) and Gore-Tex† surgical membrane on postsurgical adhesion formation Fertil Steril 1992 57 1 199 201 1730317
  70. [73]Maxson WS Herbert CM Oldfield EL Hill GA Efficacy of a modified oxidized cellulose fabric in the prevention of adhesion formation Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988 26 2 160 165 3220319
  71. [74]Cho WJ Oh SH Lee JH Alginate film as a novel post-surgical tissue adhesion barrier J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010 21 6 701 713 20482979
  72. [75]Takagi K Tsuchiya T Araki M Yamasaki N Nagayasu T Hyon SH Nakajima N Novel biodegradable powder for preventing postoperative pleural adhesion J Surg Res 2013 179 1 e13 e19 22482759
  73. [76]Peyton CC Keys T Tomblyn S Burmeister D Beumer JH Holleran JL Halofuginone infused keratin hydrogel attenuates adhesions in a rodent cecal abrasion model J Surg Res 2012 178 2 545 552 22901798
  74. [77]DeCherney AH diZerega GS Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers Surg Clin N Am 1997 77 3 671 688 9194886
  75. [78]Wiseman D Domb AJ Polymers for the prevention of surgical adhesions Polymeric site-specific pharmacotherapy 1994 New York Wiley 370 421
  76. [79]Haney AF Doty E Murine peritoneal injury and de novo adhesion formation caused by oxidized-regenerated cellulose (Interceed [TC7]) but not expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) Fertil Steril 1992 57 1 202 208 1730318
  77. [80]Mettler L Audebert A Lehmann-Willenbrock E Schive K Jacobs VR Prospective clinical trial of SprayGel as a barrier to adhesion formation: an interim analysis J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003 10 3 339 344 14567808
  78. [81]Di Spiezio SA Spinelli M Bramante S Scognamiglio M Greco E Guida M Efficacy of a polyethylene oxide-sodium carboxymethylcellulose gel in prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011 18 4 462 469 21777835
  79. [82]Fuchs N Smorgick N Ben Ami I Vaknin Z Tovbin Y Halperin R Pansky M Intercoat (Oxiplex/AP gel) for preventing intrauterine adhesions after operative hysteroscopy for suspected retained products of conception: double-blind, prospective, randomized pilot study J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014 21 1 126 130 23954387
  80. [83]Li X Wu L Zhou Y Fan X Huang J Wu J New crosslinked hyaluronan gel for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage in patients with delayed miscarriage: a prospective, multicenter, randomized Controlled Trial J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019 26 1 94 99 29678756
  81. [84]Acunzo G Guida M Pellicano M Tommaselli GA Di Spiezio SA Bifulco G Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study Hum Reprod 2003 18 9 1918 1921 12923149
  82. [85]Ducarme G Davitian C Zarrouk S Uzan M Poncelet C Interest of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a case-control study J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2006 35 7 691 695 17088770
  83. [86]Thubert T Dussaux C Demoulin G Rivain AL Trichot C Deffieux X Influence of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel on pregnancy rate and hysteroscopic outcomes following surgical removal of intra-uterine adhesions Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015 193 65 69 26246163
  84. [87]Sikkink CJ de Man B Bleichrodt RP van Goor H Auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel does not reduce intra-abdominal adhesions or abscess formation in a rat model of peritonitis J Surg Res 2006 136 2 255 259 17059836
  85. [88]De Clercq K Schelfhout C Bracke M De Wever O Van Bockstal M Ceelen W Genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres as a strategy to prevent postsurgical peritoneal adhesions: In vitro and in vivo characterization Biomaterials 2016 96 33 46 27135715
  86. [89]van Steensel S Liu H Vercoulen TF Hadfoune M Breukink SO Stassen LP Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by a hyaluronic acid gel; an experimental study in rats J Biomater Appl 2020 35 7 887 897 32878535
  87. [90]Tang CL Jayne DG Seow-Choen F Ng YY Eu KW Mustapha N A randomized controlled trial of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel (Intergel) in the prevention of adhesions following abdominal surgery Ann Surg 2006 243 4 449 55 16552194 PMC1448972
  88. [91]Toole BP Wight TN Tammi MI Hyaluronan-cell interactions in cancer and vascular disease J Biol Chem 2002 277 7 4593 4596 11717318
  89. [92]Tan A Argenta P Ramirez R Bliss R Geller M The use of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective review of outcomes Ann Surg Oncol 2009 16 2 499 505 19018596
  90. [93]Beck DE Cohen Z Fleshman JW Kaufman HS van Goor H Wolff BG Adhesion Study Group Steering C. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine Dis Colon Rectum 2003 46 10 1310 9 14530667
  91. [94]Hajibandeh S Hajibandeh S Saeed S Bird J Kannappa L Ratnayake I Effect of hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) on outcomes of abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials Updates Surg 2022 74 3 865 881 34148173
  92. [95]Torres-de la Roche LA Devassy R de Wilde MS Cezar C Krentel H Korell M De Wilde RL A new approach to avoid ovarian failure as well function-impairing adhesion formation in endometrioma infertility surgery Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020 301 5 1113 1115 32206876
  93. [96]Ziegler N De Wilde RL Reduction of adhesion formation after gynaecological adhesiolysis surgery with 4DryField PH - a retrospective, controlled study with second look laparoscopies J Obstet Gynaecol 2022 42 4 658 664 34392782
  94. [97]Ahmad M Crescenti F Significant adhesion reduction with 4DryField PH after release of adhesive small bowel obstruction Surg J (N Y) 2019 5 1 e28 e34 31093531 PMC6510661
  95. [98]Poehnert D Neubert L Klempnauer J Borchert P Jonigk D Winny M Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField((R)) PH and arista AH in the optimized peritoneal adhesion model Int J Med Sci 2019 16 10 1350 1355 31692813 PMC6818195
  96. [100]Poehnert D Neubert L Winny M Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField((R)) PH, HaemoCer PLUS and StarSil((R)) in the optimized peritoneal adhesion model Int J Med Sci 2024 21 3 424 430 38250612 PMC10797680
  97. [101]Ahmad G Kim K Thompson M Agarwal P O’Flynn H Hindocha A Watson A Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 3 3 Cd000475 32199406 PMC7085418

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, S. D., Alkatout, I., Dornhoefer, N., Herrmann, J., Klapdor, R., Meinhold-Heerlein, I., Meszaros, J., Mustea, A., Oppelt, P., Wallwiener, M., & Kraemer, B.
Affiliations
  • Clemenshospital Münster (DE)
  • Sophien-und Hufeland Klinikum (DE)
  • Albertinen Diakoniewerk (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • University Hospital in Halle (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Sebastian D.
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2024-06-15
Volume
310
Issue
2
Pages
655-672
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W4399700701
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
PlantTec Medical GmbH (unrestricted educational grant)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
peritoneal adhesions, adhesion prevention, anti-adhesion barrier, gynecologic surgery, second-look surgery, oxidized regenerated cellulose, polyethylene glycol, hyaluronic acid, icodextrin, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, modified starch, dextran, infertility, postoperative pain
MeSH terms
Tissue Adhesions, Female, Humans, Peritoneal Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Second-Look Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review