Uni-and multivariate models for investigating potential prognostic factors in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Abstract
With a worldwide incidence estimated at 8-15 per 100,000 population a year, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is a common clinical finding for otologists. There is a shortage of information on the clinical factors capable of predicting hearing recovery and response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the prognostic value of clinical variables in relation to hearing recovery, in a cohort of 117 consecutive patients with ISSHL. Clinical parameters (signs, symptoms, comorbidities and treatments) and audiometric data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate statistical approaches for prognostic purposes to identify any correlation with hearing recovery, also expressed according to the Wilson criteria. Univariate analysis showed that age and hypertension were significantly related to hearing outcome (p = 0.004 and p = 0.015, respectively). Elderly patients and those with hypertension were at higher risk of experiencing no hearing recovery (OR = 3.25 and OR = 2.89, respectively). Age was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.007). Tinnitus as a presenting symptom showed a trend towards an association with hearing recovery (p = 0.07). The treatment regimen, the time elapsing between the onset of symptoms and the start of therapy (p = 0.34), and the duration of the treatment (p = 0.83) were unrelated to recovery on univariate analysis. Among the parameters considered, only age was significantl…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older age and HTN are significant negative prognostic factors for recovery from ISSNHL.
“Moreover, older age and HTN are significant negative prognostic factors for recovery from ISSNHL [20,32].”
From Prognostic Factors Associated with Recovery from Recurrent Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Retrospective Analysis and Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jeon, S. Y., Kang, D. W., Kim, S. H., Byun, J. Y., & Yeo, S. G. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11051453 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lionello, M., Staffieri, C., Breda, S., Turato, C., Giacomelli, L., Magnavita, P., de Filippis, C., Staffieri, A., & Marioni, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Lionello, Marco
- Venue
- European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
- Published
- 2014-03-25
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1899-1906
- ISSN
- 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-4726
- OpenAlex
- W1991335988
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, prognostic factors, hearing recovery, age, hypertension, tinnitus, treatment timing, treatment duration, clinical outcome prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Audiometry, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Diuretics, Osmotic, Female, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pentoxifylline, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tinnitus, Multivariate Analysis, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review