Cited by 47Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Uni-and multivariate models for investigating potential prognostic factors in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Lionello, Marco, Staffieri, Claudia, Breda, Stefano, Turato, Chiara, Giacomelli, Luciano, Magnavita, Paola, de Filippis, Cosimo, Staffieri, Alberto +1 more·2015·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

With a worldwide incidence estimated at 8-15 per 100,000 population a year, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is a common clinical finding for otologists. There is a shortage of information on the clinical factors capable of predicting hearing recovery and response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the prognostic value of clinical variables in relation to hearing recovery, in a cohort of 117 consecutive patients with ISSHL. Clinical parameters (signs, symptoms, comorbidities and treatments) and audiometric data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate statistical approaches for prognostic purposes to identify any correlation with hearing recovery, also expressed according to the Wilson criteria. Univariate analysis showed that age and hypertension were significantly related to hearing outcome (p = 0.004 and p = 0.015, respectively). Elderly patients and those with hypertension were at higher risk of experiencing no hearing recovery (OR = 3.25 and OR = 2.89, respectively). Age was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.007). Tinnitus as a presenting symptom showed a trend towards an association with hearing recovery (p = 0.07). The treatment regimen, the time elapsing between the onset of symptoms and the start of therapy (p = 0.34), and the duration of the treatment (p = 0.83) were unrelated to recovery on univariate analysis. Among the parameters considered, only age was significantl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-014-2992-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lionello, M., Staffieri, C., Breda, S., Turato, C., Giacomelli, L., Magnavita, P., de Filippis, C., Staffieri, A., & Marioni, G.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Lionello, Marco
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2014-03-25
Volume
272
Issue
8
Pages
1899-1906
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W1991335988
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, prognostic factors, hearing recovery, age, hypertension, tinnitus, treatment timing, treatment duration, clinical outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Audiometry, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Diuretics, Osmotic, Female, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pentoxifylline, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tinnitus, Multivariate Analysis, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review