Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repair of nasal septal perforation using middle turbinate flap (monopedicled superiory based bone included conchal flap): a new unilateral middle turbinate mucosal flap technique

Hanci, Deniz, Altun, Huseyin·2015·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
DOI 10.1007/s00405-014-3266-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled The purpose of this study is to present a new approach for treatment of nasal septal perforation using middle turbinate flap. A consecutive study with follow-up of 31 patients with nasal septal perforation treated using middle turbinate flap. All patients underwent an endoscopic repair of nasal septal perforation using middle turbinate flap. All patients were followed for 18-24 months. Complete closure of the perforation was achieved in 29 of the 31 patients. Complete failure of the repair was observed in two patients. All patients showed nasal crusting in varying degrees for a period of 2-4 weeks. None of the patients showed nasal obstruction or atrophic rhinitis symptoms (stuffy nose, purulent postnasal drip, nasal crusting, epistaxis and anosmia) in postoperative follow-up. This technique provides a new method with many advantages compared to other techniques for closure of septal perforations. Level of evidence IV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-014-3266-1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Hanci, D., & Altun, H.
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-09-05
Volume
272
Issue
7
Pages
1707-1712
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
DOI
10.1007/s00405-014-3266-1
OpenAlex
W2090978986
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
nasal septal perforation, nasal crusting, nasal obstruction, atrophic rhinitis, perforation closure
MeSH terms
Adult, Olfaction Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Nasal Mucosa, Nasal Septum, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Surgical Flaps, Turbinates, Wound Healing, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery, Nasal Surgical Procedures, Nasal Septal Perforation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.