The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) for Spanish-speaking patients
Abstract
Our objective was to perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) to Spanish language. SNOT-22 was translated, back translated, and a pretest trial was performed. The study included 119 individuals divided into 60 cases, who met diagnostic criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis according to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis 2012; and 59 controls, who reported no sino-nasal disease. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha test, reproducibility with Kappa coefficient, reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), validity with Mann-Whitney U test and responsiveness with Wilcoxon test. In cases, Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 both before and after treatment, as for controls, it was 0.90 at their first test assessment and 0.88 at 3 weeks. Kappa coefficient was calculated for each item, with an average score of 0.69. ICC was also performed for each item, with a score of 0.87 in the overall score and an average among all items of 0.71. Median score for cases was 47, and 2 for controls, finding the difference to be highly significant (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). Clinical changes were observed among treated patients, with a median score of 47 and 13.5 before and after treatment, respectively (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001). The effect size resulted in 0.14 in treated patients whose status at 3 weeks was unvarying; 1.03 in those who were better and 1.89 for much better group. All controls we…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quality-of-life questionnaires most used in allergic rhinitis are the RQLQ and the ESPRINT.
“The QOL questionnaires most used in AR (Table 4 [35,36,86,104-112]) are the RQLQ (validated in Spanish [109]) and the ESPRINT (Spanish QOL questionnaire for rhinitis)”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [108]
Citations
Cites
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n · Cited by 6,060
Fokkens, W. J., Lund, V. J., Mullol, J., Bachert, C., Alobid, I., Baroody, F., Cohen, N., Cervin, A., Douglas, R., Gevaert, P., et al. (2012) · Rhinology journal · doi:10.4193/rhino12.000 · Cited by 2,387
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 34(5):447–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x · DOI
- Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A (1998) Assessment of the reliability of clinical findings: the intraclass correlation coefficient. Med Clin (Barc) 110(4):142–145
- Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174 · DOI · Paper page
- Lange B, Thilsing T, Al-kalemji A, Baelum J, Martinussen T, Kjeldsen A (2011) The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 validated for Danish patients. Dan Med Bull 58(2):A4235
- Schalek P, Otruba L, Hahn A (2010) Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a validation of the Czech version of SNOT-22 questionnaire. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(3):473–475. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1180-8 · DOI
- Sahlstrand-Johnson P, Ohlsson B, Von Buchwald C, Jannert M, Ahlner-Elmqvist M (2011) A multi-centre study on quality of life and absenteeism in patients with CRS referred for endoscopic surgery. Rhinology 49(4):420–428. doi: 10.4193/Rhino11.101 · DOI
- Lu W, Qi F, Gao ZQ, Feng GD, Yuan XD, Jin XF (2008) Quality of life survey on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis by using Chinese version of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22). Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 43(1):18–21
- Vaitkus S, Padervinskis E, Balsevicius T, Siupsinskiene N, Staikuniene J, Ryskiene S, Lisauskaite L, Vaitkus J (2013) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 for Lithuanian patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(6):1843–1848. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2282-2 · DOI
- Kosugi EM, Chen VG, Fonseca VM, Cursino MM, Mendes Neto JA, Gregorio LC (2011) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT): 22 to Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 77(5):663–669 · DOI
- Jalessi M, Farhadi M, Kamrava SK, Amintehran E, Asghari A, Rezaei Hemami M, Mobasseri A, Masroorchehr M (2013) The reliability and validity of the persian version of sinonasal outcome test 22 (snot 22) questionnaires. Iran Red Crescent Med J 15(5):404–408. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.7937 · DOI
- Lachanas VA, Tsea M, Tsiouvaka S, Hajiioannou JK, Skoulakis CE, Bizakis JG (2014) The sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22: validation for Greek patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2969-7 · DOI
- George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference 11.0 update, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de los Santos, G., Reyes, P., del Castillo, R., Fragola, C., & Royuela, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
- ORCID
- Royuela, Ana
- Venue
- European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
- Published
- 2014-12-16
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3335-3340
- ISSN
- 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-4726
- OpenAlex
- W2079506748
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- SNOT-22, cross-cultural adaptation, Spanish translation, chronic rhinosinusitis, quality of life, patient-reported outcome measures, instrument validation, internal consistency, reproducibility, responsiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review