Cited by 8Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Soft palate cephalometric changes with a mandibular advancement device may be associated with polysomnographic improvement in obstructive sleep apnea

Kim, Hong Joong, Hong, Seung-No, Lee, Woo Hyun, Ahn, Jae-Cheul, Cha, Min-Sang, Rhee, Chae-Seo, Kim, Jeong-Whun·2018·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

Purpose It is unclear whether soft palate-associated changes in cephalometry associated with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) are independently associated with improvements in polysomnography (PSG) respiratory parameters in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Methods This retrospective review aimed to identify the association between soft palate-associated changes in cephalometry and PSG changes after application of an MAD. Korean patients diagnosed with OSA who underwent cephalometry with or without an MAD were enrolled. All the patients were evaluated after undergoing full-night PSG twice: once with an MAD and once without. Cephalometric findings were measured using an image analyzer.Results Mean apnea-hypopnea index significantly decreased with an MAD from 36.4/h to 14.7/h (p < 0.001). Retropalatal airway space significantly increased with an MAD from 6.6 to 7.3 mm (p = 0.013). Soft palate length also significantly decreased with an MAD from 43.6 to 42.3 mm (p = 0.02). Although these findings were shown by responders (patients with a reduction of apnea-hypopnea index by more than 50%), there were no significant changes in non-responders. However, retroglossal airway space did not significantly increase with an MAD even in responders.Conclusions Improvement of OSA with an MAD can be predicted with soft palate-associated upper airway changes shown in cephalometry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-018-5007-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 8

Authors
Kim, H. J., Hong, S.-N., Lee, W. H., Ahn, J.-C., Cha, M.-S., Rhee, C.-S., & Kim, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Bundang Jesaeng Hospital (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeong-Whun
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2018-05-23
Volume
275
Issue
7
Pages
1811-1817
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2803384562
Cited by
8
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, mandibular advancement device, soft palate, cephalometric analysis, soft palate length, apnea-hypopnea index, upper airway, treatment response prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cephalometry, Female, Humans, Larynx, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Palate, Soft, Retrospective Studies, Polysomnography, Mandibular Advancement, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review