Evidence for two different ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorders in a community sample of adolescents and young adults
Abstract
For the 11th revision of the International classification of diseases, a general category of posttraumatic stress disorders has been proposed with two distinct sibling disorders: posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). General population data are examined on evidence for these two disorders. Data were drawn from a 10-year prospective longitudinal, epidemiological study with a representative community sample (N = 3021, 14-24 years at baseline) in Germany. Mixture modelling on latent classes was conducted in a subset of all reported episodes with exposure to interpersonal traumas. Associations between class membership, symptom criteria, and other mental disorders were investigated. Four distinctly interpretable latent classes were found. Class 1 episodes (N = 181) typically included core PTSD symptoms associated with strong impairment (OR 11.68; 95 % CI 4.54-30.05). 18.3 % of these episodes matched the criteria of ICD-11 PTSD. Class 2 episodes (N = 78) had a high probability of PTSD core symptoms and disturbances in self-organization and were associated with strong impairment (OR 38.47; 95 % CI 15.77-93.86). Half of them (49.4 %) matched the proposed ICD-11 criteria of CPTSD. Class 3 (N = 79) was typically characterized by episodes with disturbances in self-organization but a low probability of PTSD core symptoms and impairment. Class 4 (N = 633) was related to a relatively low probability of symptom reports. Membership in class 2 was associated with lowe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DSO symptoms have been empirically identified in children, adolescents, and young adults.
“However, DSO symptoms also have been empirically identified in children [66, 143], and adolescents and young adults [122, 131].”
From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Perkonigg, A., Höfler, M., Cloitre, M., Wittchen, H.-U., Trautmann, S., & Maercker, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Perkonigg, Axel
- Venue
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-08-31
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-328
- ISSN
- 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
- 0940-1334
- 1433-8491
- OpenAlex
- W1232481970
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, complex PTSD, ICD-11, young adults, interpersonal trauma, latent class analysis, disturbances in self-organization, comorbidities, educational attainment, social class, community sample
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Residence Characteristics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Logistic Models, International Classification of Diseases, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review