Cited by 16Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Trajectory and early predictors of apathy development in first-episode psychosis and healthy controls: A 10-year follow-up study

Open access
Lyngstad, Siv Hege, Gardsjord, Erlend Strand, Engen, Magnus Johan, Haatveit, Beathe, Ihler, Henrik Myhre, Wedervang-Resell, Kirsten, Simonsen, Carmen, Melle, Ingrid +1 more·2020·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Apathy is prevalent in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and associated with reduced global functioning. Investigations of the trajectory of apathy and its early predictors are needed to develop new treatment interventions. We here measured the levels of apathy over the first 10 years of treatment in FEP and in healthy controls (HC). We recruited 198 HC and 198 FEP participants. We measured apathy with the Apathy Evaluation Scale, self-report version, psychotic symptoms with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, depression with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, functioning with the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and also estimated the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). The longitudinal development of apathy and its predictors were explored using linear mixed models analyses. Associations to functioning at 10 years were investigated using multiple hierarchical linear regression analyses. In HC, mean apathy levels were low and stable. In FEP, apathy levels decreased significantly during the first year of treatment, followed by long-term stability. High individual levels of apathy at baseline were associated with higher apathy levels during the follow-up. Long DUP and high baseline levels of depression predicted higher apathy levels at follow-ups. The effect of DUP was persistent, while the effect of baseline depression decreased over time. At 10 years, apathy was statistically significantly associated with reduced functioning. The early phase of the disorder may be critical to the development of apathy in FEP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-020-01112-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 16

Authors
Lyngstad, S. H., Gardsjord, E. S., Engen, M. J., Haatveit, B., Ihler, H. M., Wedervang-Resell, K., Simonsen, C., Melle, I., & Færden, A.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Lyngstad, Siv Hege
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
270
Issue
6
Pages
709-722
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W3010636237
Cited by
16
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF (#2006233, #2006258, #2011085, #2014102, #2015088)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (223273/F50)
  • Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen (SKGJ-MED-008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
apathy, first-episode psychosis, duration of untreated psychosis, depression, functional outcome, Global Assessment of Functioning, Apathy Evaluation Scale, early predictors, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Disease Progression, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review