Anger and aggressiveness in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and the mediating role of responsibility, non-acceptance of emotions, and social desirability
Open accessAbstract
According to psychodynamic and cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anger and aggression play an important role in the development and maintenance of the disorder. (Sub-) clinical samples with OCD have reported higher anger and anger suppression. Patients with checking-related symptoms of OCD showed a less aggressive self-concept as assessed by an Implicit Association Test (IAT). This study assessed anger and aggressiveness self-concepts in OCD as well as possible mediators of the link between OCD and aggressiveness. A total of 48 patients with OCD and 45 healthy controls were included. Measures included the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-II and an aggressiveness self-concept IAT (Agg-IAT). An inflated sense of responsibility, non-acceptance of emotions, and social desirability were tested as mediators. As expected, patients with OCD reported higher trait anger and anger suppression compared to healthy controls. Contrary to hypotheses, the aggressiveness self-concept (Agg-IAT) did not differ between groups. The inflated sense of responsibility mediated the relationship between group and anger suppression. Non-acceptance of negative emotions mediated the relationship between group and trait anger, as well as anger suppression. However, comorbidities and medication may account for some effect in anger suppression. Elevated trait anger and anger suppression in OCD patients could be explained by dysfunctional beliefs or maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Emotion regulation therapy might help to enhance awareness and acceptance of emotions and possibly improve treatment outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mindfulness practices improve one's ability to be mindful.
“Interestingly, mindfulness practices improve one’s ability to be mindful [93].”
From Acceptance Mindfulness-Trait as a Protective Factor for Post-Natal Depression: A Preliminary Research (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Discussion’s Clinical implications section suggests that training in emotional acceptance might help patients with OCD, but it does not say that mindfulness practices improve the ability to be mindful. Searches for mindfulness practice and mindfulness training found no passage addressing that claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 31
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [39]Stöber J Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17) Diagnostica 1999 45 173 177 10.1026/0012-1924.45.4.173 · DOI
- Authors
- Cludius, B., Mannsfeld, A. K., Schmidt, A. F., & Jelinek, L.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cludius, Barbara
- Venue
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
- Published
- 2020-11-05
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1179-1191
- ISSN
- 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
- 0940-1334
- 1433-8491
- PMC
- PMC8354876
- OpenAlex
- W3097609740
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, anger, aggression, anger suppression, social desirability, emotion regulation, mediators
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Anger, Emotions, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Social Desirability, Social Responsibility, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review