Cited by 22Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

ADHD prevalence in patients with hypersexuality and paraphilic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Korchia, Théo, Boyer, Laurent, Deneuville, Manon, Etchecopar-Etchart, Damien, Lancon, Christophe, Fond, Guillaume·2022·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Hypersexuality and paraphilic disorders have been associated with increased ADHD in several studies. To determine the prevalence of ADHD in hypersexuality and paraphilic disorders. Three databases (Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were explored. Using random effects models, we calculated the pooled estimate of ADHD prevalence. The leave-1-out method and subgroup analyses were carried out to identify sources of heterogeneity. Seven studies from three countries (N = 730 patients with hypersexuality) were included (including five US studies). The overall estimate of the prevalence of ADHD in patients with hypersexuality or paraphilic disorders was 22.6% (95% interval: 17-29.4) with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 63%). No publication bias was observed according to Egger's test. We found no significant difference in ADHD prevalence between the following subgroups: hypersexuality vs. paraphilic disorders, studies exploring the history of childhood ADHD vs. adult ADHD, US studies vs. others. The French study was a source of heterogeneity with a much lower rate than others (4.5%) but did not significantly change the prevalence estimate. Removing this study increases the prevalence to 25%. We found no association between the year of publication and ADHD prevalence. ADHD is much more frequent in populations with hypersexuality or paraphilic disorders compared to the general population. It should be systematically screened. The subgroup analyses were not sufficient to identify all…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-022-01421-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korchia, T., Boyer, L., Deneuville, M., Etchecopar-Etchart, D., Lancon, C., & Fond, G.
Affiliations
Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Fond, Guillaume
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2022-05-12
Volume
272
Issue
8
Pages
1413-1420
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W4280577714
Cited by
22
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hypersexuality, paraphilic disorders, ADHD prevalence, comorbidities, childhood ADHD, adult ADHD, ADHD screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Paraphilic Disorders, Research Design, Prevalence, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review