Psychopathology in dual diagnosis and non-addicted schizophrenics—are there differences
Abstract
In a previous publication we reported lifetime and 3-month prevalence estimates for substance use in two large samples of schizophrenic inpatients (Soyka et al. 1993). A subsequent analysis of psychopathological findings assessed by means of the AMDP Manual (Guy and Ban 1982) in schizophrenic in-patients of the Haar Mental State Hospital (N=447), in whom a lifetime prevalence for substance use of 42.9% (3-month prevalence 29%) had been reported, was performed. While the overall differences between substance using (dual diagnosis) and nonusing schizophrenics were small, dual diagnosis patients in general reported more positive symptoms, especially more intense hallucinations. These differences could basically be demonstrated in patients with current (3-month) substance use on admission but not on discharge possibly as a result of substance use. Most marked and highly significant results were found with respect to previous suicide attempts and delinquency which were more prevalent in dual diagnosis schizophrenics. Results of this study indicate that dual diagnosis patients compared to other schizophrenics represent a more disturbed patient group. Implications for the self-medication hypothesis for substance use in schizophrenia and future research in this area are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dual disorders are associated with worse clinical and social outcomes than noncomorbid severe mental illness, including more hospitalizations, poorer treatment compliance, more relapses, higher rates of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, higher homelessness, more psychiatric symptoms, poorer treatment outcomes, and greater suicide rate.
“This dual disorder often starts during youth and leads to significant societal costs, including lower employability rates, more hospitalizations, and higher risk of homelessness and of suicide attempts when compared to those with a serious mental illness without substance misuse.”
From Mobile intervention for individuals with psychosis, dual disorders, and their common comorbidities: A literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Soyka, M., Albus, M., Immler, B., Kathmann, N., & Hippius, H.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Institute of Mental Health and Hospital (IN)
- Venue
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 251
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 232-238
- ISSN
- 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
- 0940-1334
- 1433-8491
- OpenAlex
- W2052945478
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, dual diagnosis, substance use, psychopathology, positive symptoms, hallucinations, suicide attempts, delinquency, self-medication hypothesis, lifetime prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Suicide, Attempted, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review