Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Y chromosome homogeneity in the Korean population

Kim, Soon Hee, Han, Myun Soo, Kim, Wook, Kim, Won·2010·International Journal of Legal Medicine

Abstract

The distribution of Y-chromosomal variation from the 12 Y-SNP and 17 Y-STR markers was determined in six major provinces (Seoul-Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheong, Jeolla, Gyeongsang, and Jeju) to evaluate these populations' possible genetic structure and differentiation in Korea. As part of the present study, a 10-plex SNaPshot assay and two singleplex SNaPshot assays were developed. Based on the result of 12 Y-SNP markers (M9, M45, M89, M119, M122, M174, M175, M214, RPS4Y, P31, SRY465, and 47z), almost 78.9% of tested samples belonged to haplogroup O-M175 (including its subhaplogroups O3-M122: 44.3%, O2b*-SRY465: 22.5%, O2b1-47z: 8.7%), and 12.6% of the tested samples belonged to haplogroup C-RPS4Y. A total of 475 haplotypes were identified using 17 Y-STR markers included in the Yfiler kit, among which 452 (95.2%) were individual-specific. The overall haplotype diversity for the 17 Y-STR loci was 0.9997 and the discrimination capacity was 0.9387. Pairwise genetic distances and AMOVA of the studied Korean provinces reflected no patrilineal substructure in Korea, except for Jeju Island. Thus, this survey shows that the present data of Korean individuals could be helpful to establish a comprehensive forensic reference database for frequency estimation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00414-010-0501-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Gusmão L, Butler JM, Carracedo A, Gill P, Kayser M, Mayr WR, Morling N, Prinz M, Roewer L, Tyler-Smith C, Schneider PM (2006) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations of the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis. Int J Leg Med 120:191–200 · DOI
  2. Roewer L, Willuweit S, Krüger C, Nagy M, Rychkov S, Morozowa I, Naumova O, Schneider Y, Zhukova O, Stoneking M, Nasidze I (2008) Analysis of Y chromosome STR haplotypes in the European part of Russia reveals high diversities but non-significant genetic distances between populations. Int J Leg Med 122:219–223 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chun BW, Shin SC, Kim YJ, Kim KS, Choi DH, Kim KH, Kim JY, Kang HS (2005) Allele frequencies and haplotypes of the STR loci of the PowerPlex Y-system in southern populations from Korea. Forensic Sci Int 148:225–231 · DOI
  4. Hwang JH, Lee H, Lee YA, Han MS, Kim W, Jin I, Cho NS (2007) Haplotypes for 12 Y-chromosomal STR loci in a Korean population (the central region). Forensic Sci Int 168:73–84 · DOI
  5. Kim SH, Kim NY, Hong SB, Cho NS, Kim JJ, Han MS, Kim W (2008) Genetic polymorphisms of 16 Y chromosomal STR loci in Korean population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2:e9–e10 · DOI
  6. Nonaka I, Minaguchi K, Takezaki N (2007) Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups in the Japanese population and their relationship to 16 Y-STR polymorphisms. Ann Hum Genet 71:480–495 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mizuno N, Kitayanma T, Fujii K, Nakahara H, Yoshida K, Sekiguchi K, Yonezawa N, Nakano M, Kasai K (2010) A forensic method for the simultaneous analysis of biallelic markers identifying Y chromosome haplogroups inferred as having originated in Asia and the Japanese archipelago. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:73–79 · DOI
  8. Robino C, Crobu F, Di Gaetano C, Bekada A, Benhamamouch S, Cerutti N, Piazza A, Inturri S, Torre C (2008) Analysis of Y-chromosomal SNP haplogroups and STR haplotypes in an Algerian population sample. Int J Leg Med 122:251–255 · DOI
  9. Ferri G, Tofanelli S, Alù M, Taglioli L, Radheshi E, Corradini B, Paoli G, Capelli C, Beduschi G (2010) Y-STR variation in Albanian populations: implications on the match probabilities and the genetic legacy of the minority claiming an Egyptian descent. Int J Leg Med. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0432-x · DOI
  10. Willuweit S, Roewer L, International Forensic Y Chromosome User Group (2007) Y chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD): update. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:83–87 · DOI
  11. Karafet TM, Mendez FL, Meilerman MB, Underhill PA, Zegura SL, Hammer MF (2008) New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree. Genome Res 18:830–838 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Sanchez JJ, Børsting C, Hallenberg C, Buchard A, Hernandez A, Morling N (2003) Multiplex PCR and minisequencing of SNPs—a model with 35 Y chromosome SNPs. Forensic Sci Int 137:74–84 · DOI
  13. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University, New York · DOI
  14. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50 · DOI
  15. Lee JW, Lee HS, Hwang JJ (2002) Statistical analysis for estimating heterogeneity of the Korean population in DNA typing using STR loci. Int J Leg Med 116:153–160 · DOI
  16. Hong SB, Jin HJ, Kwak KD, Kim W (2006) Y-chromosome haplogroup O3-M122 variation in East Asia and its implications for the peopling of Korea. Korean J Genet 28:1–8
  17. Xue Y, Zerjal T, Bao W, Zhu S, Shu Q, Xu J, Du R, Fu S, Li P, Hurles ME, Yang H, Tyler-Smith C (2006) Male demography in East Asia: a north–south contrast in human population expansion times. Genetics 172:2431–2439 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. H., Han, M. S., Kim, W., & Kim, W.
Venue
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published
2010-08-17
Volume
124
Issue
6
Pages
653-657
ISSN
  • 0937-9827
  • 1437-1596
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review