Cited by 7

Forensic facial reconstruction: A computer tomography study of facial soft tissue thickness in Nigerian adult male multi-ethnic population

Adegbite, Nurudeen, Mura, Manuela, Shafiu, Haliru, Avery, Christopher, Ahmed, Waqar·2025·International Journal of Legal Medicine

Abstract

Facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) was measured from computer tomography scans of 55 Nigeria adult males. Forensic facial reconstruction (FFR) with own population FSTT values can be vital in recognition of skeletal remains and has been used as an adjunct in forensic science.There are no published FSTT values for this population. Measurements were obtained at 12 mid-sagittal and 19 bilateral points totalling 50 and by use of a software package called RadiAnt. In comparison to previous studies in Africa, measurements were taken from more points and with a diverse age of 18 to 100 years. Mean FSTT values were determined for these combined Nigerian male ethnicities. These values will suffice in FFR for this population and for the Hausa adult male. This population homogenously showed more soft tissue volumes on the left than the right side at all FSTT points with the most relative difference at the frontal eminence and the least at the mid-point of the masseter muscle. The low relative difference at the mid-masseters may relate with the soft floury diets of this population. These combined Nigerian male ethnicities midline FSTT values showed significant differences in the lower third of the face when compared with other population data. The values for the right side of the face shows even more substantial differences at multiple points when compared with published data of other populations. The change with age compares well with other studies. These data will be applicable for FFR in the CNME than data of other populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00414-025-03455-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most included studies reported balanced or near-balanced sex distributions, but Adegbite et al. (2025) included male-only samples.

    “Most investigations reported balanced or near-balanced sex distributions; however, a few studies, such as Adegbite et al. (2025),[] included male-only samples, which should be interpreted cautiously in the context of sex determination.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. [1]Panenková P, Beňuš R, Masnicová S, Obertová Z, Grunt J (2012) Facial soft tissue thicknesses of the mid-face for Slovak population. Forensic Sci Int 220(1–3):293–e1 22430009
  2. [2]Stephan CN, Simpson EK (2008) Facial soft tissue depths in craniofacial identification (part 1): an analytical review of the published adult data. J Forensic Sci 53(6):1257–1272 18783476 · DOI
  3. [3]Navic P, Palee P, Prapayasatok S, Prasitwattanaseree S, Sinthubua A, Mahakkanukrauh P (2022) The development and testing of Thai facial soft tissue thickness data in three-dimensional computerized forensic facial reconstruction. Med Sci Law 62(2):113–123 34825605 · DOI
  4. [4]Sahni D, Singh G, Jit I, Singh P et al (2008) Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults. Forensic Sci Int 176(2–3):137–146 17997243 · DOI
  5. [5]Bulut O, Sipahioglu S, Hekimoglu B (2014) Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in the Turkish adult population. Forensic Sci Int 242:44–61 25023216 · DOI
  6. [6]Wilkinson C (2010) Facial reconstruction–anatomical art or artistic anatomy? J Anat 216(2):235–250 20447245 PMC2815945 · DOI
  7. [7]Wilkinson C (2004) Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge University Press
  8. [8]Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Melani RFH, de Almeida NH, de Paiva LAS (2009) Facial soft tissue thickness of Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int 193(1–3):127.e1–127.e7. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.002 19781879 · DOI
  9. [10]Lebedinskaya GV, Balueva TS, Veselovskaya E (1993) Development of methodological principles for reconstruction of the face on the basis of skull material. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP (eds) Forensic analysis of the skull. Wiley-Liss New York, pp 183–198
  10. [11]De Greef S, Claes P, Vandermeulen D, Mollemans W, Suetens P, Willems G (2006) Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int 159:S126–S146 16563680 · DOI
  11. [12]Taylor KT (2000) Forensic art and illustration. CRC Press
  12. [13]Guyomarc’h P, Velemínský P, Brůžek J, Lynnerup N, Horák N, Kučera J, Rasmussen KL, Podliska J, Dragoun Z, Smolík J et al (2018) Facial approximation of tycho Brahe’s partial skull based on estimated data with tivmi-afa3d. Forensic Sci Int 292:131–137 30296629 · DOI
  13. [14]Nelson L, Michael S (1998) The application of volume deformation to three-dimensional facial reconstruction: a comparison with previous techniques. Forensic Sci Int 94(3):167–181 9717271 · DOI
  14. [15]Suppersberger Hamre S, Ersland GA, Daux V, Parson W, Wilkinson C (2017) Three individuals, three stories, three burials from medieval Trondheim, Norway. PLOS one 12(7):e0180277 28671986 PMC5495345 · DOI
  15. [16]Rhine JS, Campbell HR (1980) Thickness of facial tissues in American Blacks. J Forensic Sci 25(4):847–858 7430993 · DOI
  16. [18]Milani C, Zangari F, Cilli E, Gruppioni G (2022) The facial reconstruction of Dante Alighieri using linear cranial measurements to predict his missing mandible. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 27 · DOI
  17. [19]Zegers RHC, Maas M, Koopman ATG, Maat GJ (2009) Are the alleged remains of Johann Sebastian Bach authentic? Med J Aust 190(4):213–216 19220191 · DOI
  18. [20]Benassi S, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Mallegni G, Mallegni F, Persiani F, Gruppioni G (2009) The face of the poet Dante Alighieri reconstructed by virtual modelling and forensic anthropology techniques. J Archaeol Sci 36(2):278–283 · DOI
  19. [21]Hayes S, Shoocongdej R, Pureepatpong N, Sangvichien S, Chintakanon K (2017) A late pleistocene woman from Tham Lod, Thailand: the influence of today on a face from the past. Antiquity 91(356):289–303 · DOI
  20. [22]Marić J, Bašić Ž, Jerković I, Mihanović F, Anđelinović Š, Kružić I (2020) Facial reconstruction of mummified remains of christian saint-Nicolosa bursa. J Cult Herit 42:249–254 · DOI
  21. [23]Deng C, Wang D, Chen J, Li K, Yang M, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Yin C, Chen P, Cao D et al (2020) Facial soft tissue thickness in Yangtze River Delta Han population: Accurate assessment and comparative analysis utilizing cone-beam CT. Leg Med 44 32217445 · DOI
  22. [24]Chen F, Chen Y, Yu Y, Qiang Y, Liu M, Fulton D, Chen T (2011) Age and sex related measurement of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and nasal profile in the Chinese population. Forensic Sci Int 212(1–3):272–e271 21715112
  23. [25]Ruiz NAP (2013) Facial soft tissue thickness of Colombian adults. Forensic Sci Int 229(1–3):160–e1 23587676
  24. [26]Sipahioğlu S, Ulubay H, Diren HB (2012) Midline facial soft tissue thickness database of Turkish population: MRI study. Forensic Sci Int 219(1–3):282–e1 22154437
  25. [27]Codinha S (2009) Facial soft tissue thicknesses for the Portuguese adult population. Forensic Sci Int 184(1–3):80–e81 19124207
  26. [28]Guyomarc’h P, Santos F, Dutailly B, Coqueugniot H (2013) Facial soft tissue depths in French adults: Variability, specificity and estimation. Forensic Sci Int 231(1–3):411–e1 23684263
  27. [31]Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Melani RFH, de Almeida NH, de Paiva LAS (2009) Facial soft tissue thickness of Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int 193(1–3):127–e1 19781879
  28. [32]Shepherd J (1981) Social factors in face recognition. In: Davies G, Ellis H,Shepherd J (eds) Perceiving and remembering faces. Academic Press, London
  29. [33]Simpson E, Henneberg M (2002) Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists 118(2):121–133 12012365 · DOI
  30. [34]Aulsebrook W, Becker P, Iscan MY (1996) Facial soft-tissue thicknesses in the adult male Zulu. Forensic Sci Int 79(2):83–102 8698296 · DOI
  31. [35]George RM (1987) The lateral craniographic method of facial reconstruction. J Forensic Sci 32(5):1305–1330 · DOI
  32. [37]Hamid S, Abuaffan AH (2016) Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions. Forensic Sci Int 266:209–214 27314547 · DOI
  33. [38]Wilkinson C, Rynn C, Peters H, Taister M, Kau CH, Richmond S (2006) A blind accuracy assessment of computer-modelled forensic facial reconstruction using computed tomography data from live subjects. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2:179–187 25868696 · DOI
  34. [39]Lodha A, Mehta M, Patel M, Menon SK (2016) Facial soft tissue thickness database of Gujarati population for forensic craniofacial reconstruction. Egypt J Forensic Sci 6(2):126–134 · DOI
  35. [40]Cavanagh D, Steyn M (2011) Facial reconstruction: soft tissue thickness values for south African Black females. Forensic Sci Int 206(13):215–e1 21288672
  36. [41]Eftekhari-Moghadam AR, Latifi SM, Nazifi HR, Rezaian J (2020) Influence of sex and body mass index on facial soft tissue thickness measurements in an adult population of southwest of Iran. Surg Radiol Anat 42:627–633 31907581 · DOI
  37. [42]Hwang H-S, Park M-K, Lee W-J, Cho J-H, Kim B-K, Wilkinson CM (2012) Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in Korean adults. J Forensic Sci 57(6):1442–1447 22621203 · DOI
  38. [43]El-Mehallawi IH, Soliman EM (2001) Ultrasonic assessment of facial soft tissue thicknesses in adult Egyptians. Forensic Sci Int 117(1–2):99–107 11230951 · DOI
  39. [44]De Greef S, Claes P, Mollemans W, Loubele M, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Willems G Semi-automated ultrasound facial soft tissue depth registration: method and validation. J Forensic Sci 50(6):JFS2004547–7 16382819
  40. [45]Domaracki M, Stephan CN (2006) Facial soft tissue thicknesses in Australian adult cadavers. J Forensic Sci 51(1):5–10 16423216 · DOI
  41. [46]Phillips V, Smuts N (1996) Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population. Forensic Sci Int 83(1):51–59 8939013 · DOI
  42. [47]Zhao J-M, Ji L-L, Han M-Q, Mou Q-N, Chu G, Chen T, Du S-Y, Hou Y-X, Guo Y-C (2021) Lip morphology estimation models based on three-dimensional images in a modern adult population from China. Int J Legal Med 135:1887–1901 33760976 · DOI
  43. [48]Shehata TI, Khattab N, Wahab TMA, Ekram AM, Elbashar YH (2023) Imaging analysis of cone beam computed tomography for present Egyptians facial soft tissue thicknesses. J Opt 52(2):915–923 · DOI
  44. [49]Sutton PR (1969) Bizygomatic diameter: the thickness of the soft tissues over the zygions. Am J Phys Anthropol 30(2):303–310 5772049 · DOI
  45. [50]De Greef S, Vandermeulen D, Claes P, Suetens P, Willems G (2009) The influence of sex, age and body mass index on facial soft tissue depths. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 5:60–65 19437147
  46. [52]Helmer R, Rohricht S, Petersen D, Mohr F (1993) Assessment of the reliability of facial reconstruction, Chapter 17. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP (eds) Forensic analysis of the skull. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, pp 229–247
  47. [53]Manhein MH, Listi GA, Barsley RE, Musselman R, Barrow NE, Ubelaker DH (2000) In vivo facial tissue depth measurements for children and adults. J Forensic Sci 45(1):48–60 10641919 · DOI
  48. [57]Atuwo AA, Bunza DB (2022) Seeing is believing: Identifying a true hausa man. East African Scholars Journal of Education, Humanities and Literature 5(3):87–92 · DOI
  49. [58]Lee W-J, Wilkinson CM, Hwang H-S, Lee S-M (2015) Correlation between average tissue depth data and quantitative accuracy of forensic craniofacial reconstructions measured by geometric surface comparison method. J Forensic Sci 60(3):572–580 25739646 · DOI
  50. [59]Lindsay KE, Rühli FJ, Deleon VB (2015) Revealing the face of ancient Egyptian: Synthesis of current and traditional approaches to evidence-based facial approximation. Anat Rec 298(6):1144–1161 25998648 · DOI
  51. [60]Coskun G, Fasoula M, Bontozoglou N (2024) Facial soft tissue depth of a contemporary adult Greek population. Int J Legal Med 1–19. T. I PMC11490456 39122874
  52. [61]Moritsugui DS, Fugiwara FVG, Vassallo FNS, Mazzilli LEN, Beaini TL, Melani RFH (2022) Facial soft tissue thickness in forensic facial reconstruction: Impact of regional differences in Brazil. PLoS ONE 17(7) 35839226 PMC9286276 · DOI
  53. [64]Tilotta F, Richard F, Glaunès J, Berar M, Gey S, Verdeille S, Rozenholc Y, Gaudy JF (2009) Construction and analysis of a head CT-scan database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int 191(1–3):112–e1 19665327
  54. [66]Yamaguchi K, Tohara H, Hara K, Nakane A, Kajisa E, Yoshimi K, Minakuchi S (2018) Relationship of aging, skeletal muscle mass, and tooth loss with masseter muscle thickness. BMC Geriatr 18:1–7 29519234 PMC5844127 · DOI
  55. [67]Hona TWPT, Stephan CN (2024) Global facial soft tissue thicknesses for craniofacial identification (2023): A review of 140 years of data since welcker’s first study. Int J Legal Med 138(2):519–535 37804332 PMC10861615 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adegbite, N., Mura, M., Shafiu, H., Avery, C., & Ahmed, W.
Venue
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published
2025-03-11
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
1953-1970
ISSN
  • 0937-9827
  • 1437-1596
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review