Cited by 98Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

MRI characteristics of atypical idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating lesions of the brain: A review of reported findings

for the MAGNIMS network, Seewann, A., Enzinger, C., Filippi, M., Barkhof, F., Rovira, A., Gass, A., Miller, D. +9 more·2008·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background Idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating lesions (IIDL) of the brain usually present with a morphologic pattern characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Atypical appearances of IIDLs also exist, however, and can pose significant diagnostic problems and uncertainty regarding prognosis and adequate therapy. We attempted to improve upon this situation by reviewing the literature. Methods We performed a PubMed search from January 1984 through December 2004 for articles in English reporting on IIDLs which had been considered as morphologically atypical (66 articles; 270 cases reported). From these publications 69 individual patient reports allowed the extraction of adequate information on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and associated disease characteristics. Results Reported atypical IIDLs most frequently manifested as large ring-like lesions (n = 27) which are now considered quite suggestive of an antibodymediated form of MS. Truly atypical IIDLs were less common and exhibited appearances which we termed megacystic (n = 8), Balolike (n = 11) and diffusely infiltrating (n = 11). Despite limitations imposed by the absence of original data the inter-rater agreement in defining these subtypes of atypical IIDLs was moderate to substantial (kappa 0.48-0.68) and we noted trends for their association with certain demographic, clinical and paraclinical variables. Interpretation We suggest that IIDLs reported as atypical in the literature can be segregated into several distinct…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-007-0754-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Occasionally, MS presents with an atypical demyelinating lesion characterised by large size (>2cm diameter, sometimes with peri-lesional oedema and mass effect), enhancement pattern (open or closed-ring enhancement) or morphology (infiltrative or heterogeneous appearance including concentric rings).

    “Occasionally, MS presents with an atypical demyelinating lesion characterised by their large size (>2cm diameter, sometimes with peri-lesional oedema and mass effect), enhancement pattern (open or closed-ring enhancement) or morphology (infiltrative or heterogeneous appearance including concentric rings).[38][39][40]”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [39]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the MAGNIMS network, Seewann, A., Enzinger, C., Filippi, M., Barkhof, F., Rovira, A., Gass, A., Miller, D., Montalban, X., Thompson, A., Yousry, T., Tintore, M., de Stefano, N., Palace, J., Rovaris, M., Polman, C., & Fazekas, F.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Fazekas, F.
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2007-11-15
Volume
255
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2089721289
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, differential diagnosis, interobserver agreement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain, Demyelinating Diseases, Diagnosis, Differential, Encephalitis, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Predictive Value of Tests, Observer Variation, Cerebrum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review