CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A combined clinical and MRI approach for outcome assessment of traumatic head injured comatose patients

Weiss, N., Galanaud, D., Carpentier, A., Tezenas de Montcel, S., Naccache, L., Coriat, P., Puybasset, L.·2008·Journal of Neurology
DOI 10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. (1995) Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 45:1015–1018 · DOI
  2. Anderson CV, Wood DM, Bigler ED, Blatter DD (1996) Lesion volume, injury severity, and thalamic integrity following head injury. J Neurotrauma 13:35–40 · DOI
  3. Blackman JA, Patrick PD, Buck ML, Rust RS Jr (2004) Paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia after brain injury. Arch Neurol 61:321–328 · DOI
  4. Born JD, Albert A, Hans P, Bonnal J (1985) Relative prognostic value of best motor response and brain stem reflexes in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 16:595–601 · DOI
  5. Carpentier A, Galanaud D, Puybasset L, Muller J-C, Lescot T, Riedl V, Dormont D, van Effenterre R (2006) Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy to predict long-term neurological outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 23:674–685 · DOI
  6. De Renzi E, Barbieri C (1992) The incidence of the grasp reflex following hemispheric lesion and its relation to frontal damage. Brain 115 Pt 1:293–313 · DOI
  7. Denny-Brown D (1958) The nature of apraxia. J Nerv Ment Dis 126:9–32 · DOI
  8. Firsching R, Woischneck D, Diedrich M, Klein S, Ruckert A, Wittig H, Dohring W (1998) Early magnetic resonance imaging of brainstem lesions after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 89:707–712 · DOI
  9. Garnett MR, Blamire AM, Corkill RG, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Rajagopalan B, Styles P (2000) Early proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normalappearing brain correlates with outcome in patients following traumatic brain injury. Brain 123 (Pt 10):2046–2054 · DOI
  10. Jellinger K, Seitelberger F (1970) Protracted post-traumatic encephalopathy. Pathology, pathogenesis and clinical implications. J Neurol Sci 10:51–94 · DOI
  11. Jordan LM, Brownstone RM, Noga BR (1992) Control of functional systems in the brainstem and spinal cord. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2:794–801 · DOI
  12. Kampfl A, Franz G, Aichner F, Pfausler B, Haring HP, Felber S, Luz G, Schocke M, Schmutzhard E (1998) The persistent vegetative state after closed head injury: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in 42 patients. J Neurosurg 88:809–816 · DOI
  13. Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, Pfausler B, Haring HP, Ulmer H, Felber S, Golaszewski S, Aichner F (1998) Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 351:1763–1767 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Laowattana S, Zeger SL, Lima JAC, Goodman SN, Wittstein IS, Oppenheimer SM (2006) Left insular stroke is associated with adverse cardiac outcome. Neurology 66:477–483 · DOI
  15. Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C, Van Bogaert P, Aerts J, Luxen A, Franck G, Maquet P (1999) Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage 9:377–382 · DOI
  16. Lavigne GJ, Kato T, Kolta A, Sessle BJ (2003) Neurobiological mechanisms involved in sleep bruxism. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:30–46 · DOI
  17. Lescot T, Bonnet MP, Zouaoui A, Muller JC, Fetita C, Coriat P, Puybasset L (2005) A quantitative computed tomography assessment of brain weight, volume, and specific gravity in severe head trauma. Intensive Care Med 31:1042–1050 · DOI
  18. Levin HS, Mendelsohn D, Lilly MA, Yeakley J, Song J, Scheibel RS, Harward H, Fletcher JM, Kufera JA, Davidson KC, Bruce D (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in relation to functional outcome of pediatric closed head injury: a test of the Ommaya- Gennarelli model. Neurosurgery 40:432–440; discussion 440–431
  19. Mascia MM, Valls-Sole J, Marti MJ, Sanz S (2005) Chewing pattern in patients with Meige’s syndrome. Mov Disord 20:26–33 · DOI
  20. Murdoch I, Nicoll JA, Graham DI, Dewar D (2002) Nucleus basalis of Meynert pathology in the human brain after fatal head injury. J Neurotrauma 19:279–284 · DOI
  21. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA (1974) Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain 97:633–654 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Selden NR, Gitelman DR, Salamon- Murayama N, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (1998) Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain. Brain 121 (Pt 12):2249–2257 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Carter BG, Butt W (2005) Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med 31:765–775 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Weiss, N., Galanaud, D., Carpentier, A., Tezenas de Montcel, S., Naccache, L., Coriat, P., & Puybasset, L.
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-02
Volume
255
Issue
2
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
DOI
10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4
Cited by
40
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review