Cited by 66Migraine and Headache StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patients with migraine do not have MRI-visible cortical lesions

Abstract

Migraine patients with multiple brain white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) may represent a diagnostic challenge. Using double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging, we studied whether cortical lesions (CLs) could be seen in these patients. Approval of the institutional review boards and written informed consent were obtained from each participant. CLs and WM lesions were assessed on brain scans from 32 migraine patients with WMHs (17 patients with and 15 without aura), and in two control groups, consisting of 15 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients and 20 healthy controls, matched for age and gender. By definition, brain WM lesions were detected in all migraine and RRMS patients. The number and volume of WM lesions were lower in migraine versus RRMS patients (p < 0.0001). No CLs were identified in migraine patients and healthy controls, whereas 20 CLs were seen in 9 (60 %) RRMS patients. The application of DIR imaging to assess focal cortical involvement seems to be useful in the diagnostic workup of patients with WMHs of unknown etiology, including those with migraine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-012-6571-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI in patients with small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, other inflammatory and noninflammatory disorders affecting white matter, and even in healthy subjects (especially in older age groups), may show brain lesions that fulfil MRI criteria for MS.

    “MRI in patients with small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, other inflammatory and noninflammatory disorders affecting white matter (see examples in Tables 2 & 3), and even in healthy subjects (especially in older age groups), may show brain lesions that fulfil MRI criteria for MS [21][22][23][24]”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The typical demyelinating lesions that characterise RIS need to be carefully differentiated from small-vessel cerebrovascular disease and nonspecific white matter lesions (the latter being common in people with migraine).

    “The typical demyelinating lesions that characterise RIS need to be carefully differentiated from small-vessel cerebrovascular disease and nonspecific white matter lesions (the latter being common in people with migraine 21,24 ).”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Cortical grey matter lesions have not been found in migraine.

    “or migraine.24”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, Fazekas F, Miller DH, Montalban X, Simon JH, Polman C, Filippi M (2006) MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of “no better explanation”. Lancet Neurol 5:841–852 · DOI
  2. Cotton F, Rambaud L, Hermier M (2006) Dual inversion recovery MRI helps identifying cortical tubers in tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsia 47:1072–1073 · DOI
  3. Fazekas F, Koch M, Schmidt R, Offenbacher H, Payer F, Freidl W, Lechner H (1992) The prevalence of cerebral damage varies with migraine type: a MRI study. Headache 32:287–291 · DOI
  4. Geurts JJ, Roosendaal SD, Calabrese M, Ciccarelli O, Agosta F, Chard DT, Gass A, Huerga E, Moraal B, Pareto D, Rocca MA, Wattjes MP, Yousry TA, Uitdehaag BM, Barkhof F (2011) Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology 76:418–424 · DOI
  5. Kruit M, van Buchem M, Launer L, Terwindt G, Ferrari M (2010) Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia 30:129–136 · DOI
  6. Kruit MC, Launer LJ, Ferrari MD, van Buchem MA (2005) Infarcts in the posterior circulation territory in migraine. The population-based MRI CAMERA study. Brain 128:2068–2077 · DOI
  7. Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Hofman PA, Bakkers JT, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD, Launer LJ (2004) Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions. JAMA 291:427–434 · DOI
  8. Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Launer LJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD (2010) Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia 30:129–136 · DOI
  9. Moschiano F, D’Amico D, Di Stefano M, Rocca N, Bussone G (2007) The role of the clinician in interpreting conventional neuroimaging findings in migraine patients. Neurol Sci 28(Suppl 2):S114–S117 · DOI
  10. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O’Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Porter A, Gladstone JP, Dodick DW (2005) Migraine and white matter hyperintensities. Curr Pain Headache Rep 9:289–293 · DOI
  12. Rossato G, Adami A, Thijs VN, Cerini R, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Mazzucco S, Anzola GP, Del Sette M, Dinia L, Meneghetti G, Zanferrari C (2010) Cerebral distribution of white matter lesions in migraine with aura patients. Cephalalgia 30:855–859 · DOI
  13. Rugg-Gunn FJ, Boulby PA, Symms MR, Barker GJ, Duncan JS (2006) Imaging the neocortex in epilepsy with double inversion recovery imaging. Neuroimage 31:39–50 · DOI
  14. Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA, Zontsich T, Graf O, Mallek R, Hittmair K (1998) Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 16:127–135 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Absinta, M., Rocca, M. A., Colombo, B., Copetti, M., Feo, D., Falini, A., Comi, G., & Filippi, M.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
Corresponding author
Filippi, Massimo
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2012-06-20
Volume
259
Issue
12
Pages
2695-2698
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2089069160
Cited by
66
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
migraine, white matter hyperintensities, cortical lesions, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, migraine with aura, brain MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review