Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term effects of tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy

Open access
Coelho, Teresa, Maia, Luis F., da Silva, Ana Martins, Cruz, Márcia W., Planté-Bordeneuve, Violaine, Suhr, Ole B., Conceiçao, Isabel, Schmidt, Hartmut H.-J., Trigo, Pedro, Kelly, Jeffery W., Labaudinière, Richard, Chan, Jason, Packman, Jeff, Grogan, Donna R.·2013·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Tafamidis, a transthyretin (TTR) kinetic stabilizer, delayed neuropathic progression in patients with Val30Met TTR familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP) in an 18-month randomized controlled trial (study Fx-005). This 12-month, open-label extension study evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tafamidis 20 mg once daily in 86 patients who earlier received blinded treatment with tafamidis or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL), Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy total quality of life (TQOL) score, and changes in neurologic function and nutritional status. We quantified the monthly rates of change in efficacy measures, and TTR stabilization, and monitored adverse events (AEs). Patients who continued on tafamidis had stable rates of change in NIS-LL (from 0.08 to 0.11/month; p = 0.60) and TQOL (from -0.03 to 0.25; p = 0.16). In patients switched from placebo, the monthly rate of change in NIS-LL declined (from 0.34 to 0.16/month; p = 0.01), as did TQOL score (from 0.61 to -0.16; p < 0.001). Patients treated with tafamidis for 30 months had 55.9 % greater preservation of neurologic function as measured by the NIS-LL than patients in whom tafamidis was initiated later. Plasma TTR was stabilized in 94.1 % of patients treated with tafamidis for 30 months. AEs were similar between groups; no patients discontinued because of an AE. Long-term tafamidis was well tolerated, with the reduced rate of neurologic deterioration sustained over 30 months. Tafamidis also slowed neurologic impairment in patients previously given placebo, but treatment benefits were greater when tafamidis was begun earlier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-013-7051-7

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Coelho, T., Maia, L. F., da Silva, A. M., Cruz, M. W., Planté-Bordeneuve, V., Suhr, O. B., Conceiçao, I., Schmidt, H. H.-J., Trigo, P., Kelly, J. W., Labaudinière, R., Chan, J., Packman, J., & Grogan, D. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2013-08-22
Volume
260
Issue
11
Pages
2802-2814
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2080914865
Cited by
344
References
32
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term effects of tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00415-013-7051-7
The paper
Coelho, T., Maia, L. F., da Silva, A. M., Cruz, M. W., Planté-Bordeneuve, V., Suhr, O. B., Conceiçao, I., Schmidt, H. H.-J., Trigo, P., Kelly, J. W., Labaudinière, R., Chan, J., Packman, J., & Grogan, D. R. (2013). Long-term effects of tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7051-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.