Detecting nocturnal hypertension in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy: proposal of a decision-support algorithm
Abstract
A pathological nocturnal blood pressure (BP) profile, either non-dipping or reverse dipping, occurs in more than 50% of subjects diagnosed with multiple system atrophy (MSA) or Parkinson's disease (PD). This may play a negative prognostic role in α-synucleinopathies, but, being mostly asymptomatic, remains largely underdiagnosed. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed at developing a decision-support algorithm to predict pathological nocturnal BP profiles during a standard tilt-table examination in PD and MSA. Sixteen MSA and 16 PD patients underwent standard tilt-table examination and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (24-h ABPM). Clinical and tilt test differences between patients with a normal and a pathological nocturnal BP profile at 24-h ABPM were assessed, and a decision-support algorithm was developed accordingly. 75% of MSA and 31 % of PD patients showed a pathological nocturnal BP profile. This was associated with more pronounced orthostatic BP drop (p = 0.03), joint occurrence of orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension (p = 0.046), and lack of BP overshoot in the late phase II (II_L, p = 0.002) and in the phase IV (p = 0.007) of the Valsalva manoeuvre. Combined ∆BP ≤0.5 mmHg in the II_L and ≤-7 mmHg in the IV phase of Valsalva manoeuvre correctly predicted a pathological nocturnal BP profile with 87.5% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity. Pathological nocturnal BP profiles are associated with evidence of cardiovascular noradrenergic failure in PD and MSA. The Valsalva manoeuvre is routinely performed during standard tilt-table examinations. We propose the naked-eye evaluation of Valsalva phase II_L and phase IV BP behaviour as time-sparing screening tool for pathological nocturnal BP profiles in PD and MSA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The absence of a BP overshoot and an absence of a HR increase during the Valsalva is pathognomonic for neurogenic OH, occurring in primary and secondary autonomic failure.
“There is strong evidence that the absence of a BP overshoot and an absence of a HR increase during the Valsalva is pathognomonic for neurogenic OH, occurring in primary and secondary autonomic failure, and the degree of hypotension and/or lack of compensation during forced expiration usually correlate with the degree of autonomic dysfunction and related symptoms. 138-143”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
The degree of hypotension and/or lack of compensation during forced expiration usually correlate with the degree of autonomic dysfunction and related symptoms.
“There is strong evidence that the absence of a BP overshoot and an absence of a HR increase during the Valsalva is pathognomonic for neurogenic OH, occurring in primary and secondary autonomic failure, and the degree of hypotension and/or lack of compensation during forced expiration usually correlate with the degree of autonomic dysfunction and related symptoms. 138-143”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
OH is frequently associated with a nocturnal 'non-dipping' or even 'reverse-dipping' BP pattern in patients with autonomic failure, with relevant therapeutic and prognostic implications.
“There is strong evidence that OH is frequently associated with a nocturnal 'non-dipping' or even 'reverse-dipping' BP pattern in patients with autonomic failure, with relevant therapeutic and prognostic implications 140,148-151”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Fanciulli, A., Strano, S., Ndayisaba, J. P., Goebel, G., Gioffrè, L., Rizzo, M., Colosimo, C., Caltagirone, C., Poewe, W., Wenning, G. K., & Pontieri, F. E.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
- Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Wenning, Gregor K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology
- Published
- 2014-04-16
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1291-1299
- ISSN
- 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-5354
- 1432-1459
- OpenAlex
- W2059134780
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- nocturnal hypertension, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, non-dipping blood pressure, reverse dipping, decision support algorithm, Valsalva maneuver, orthostatic hypotension, synucleinopathies, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, screening tool
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Algorithms, Circadian Rhythm, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Valsalva Maneuver, Case-Control Studies, Tilt-Table Test, Multiple System Atrophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review