Cited by 130Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: Molecular pathology and implications of gut microbiome, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation

Metta, Vinod, Leta, Valentina, Mrudula, Kandadai Rukmini, Prashanth, L. K., Goyal, Vinay, Borgohain, Rupam, Chung-Faye, Guy, Chaudhuri, K. Ray·2022·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Gastrointestinal symptoms and gut dysbiosis may occur before the onset of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Prediagnostic and prodromal features, such as constipation and α-synuclein pathology, can be detected several years before the clinical diagnosis of PD and have the potential to develop as early PD biomarkers. Environmental toxins and gut dysbiosis may trigger oxidative stress and mucosal inflammation, and initiate α-synuclein accumulation in the enteric nervous system, early in PD. Chronic gut inflammation can lead to a leaky gut and systemic inflammation, neuro inflammation, and neuro degeneration via gut-vagus-brain signaling or through blood-brain barrier permeability. Concepts regarding the gut-brain signaling in PD pathogenesis are changing rapidly and more investigation is required. The gut microbiota interacts with the human body by modulating the enteric and central nervous systems, and immune activity. Understanding the immune responses between gut microbiota and human body might help in elucidating the PD pathogenesis. As changes in gut microbiota composition might be associated with different clinical phenotypes of PD, gut microbiota-modulating interventions, such as probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), have the potential to restore the gut dysbiosis, reduce inflammation, and possibly modulate the clinical PD phenotype.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-021-10567-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 130

Authors
Metta, V., Leta, V., Mrudula, K. R., Prashanth, L. K., Goyal, V., Borgohain, R., Chung-Faye, G., & Chaudhuri, K. R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Metta, Vinod
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2021-04-21
Volume
269
Issue
3
Pages
1154-1163
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W3154889217
Cited by
130
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Parkinson's UK (K-1803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, gastrointestinal dysfunction, gut dysbiosis, gut microbiota, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, constipation, alpha-synuclein pathology, prodromal Parkinson's disease, biomarkers, neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier permeability, oxidative stress, environmental toxins, clinical phenotype
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Probiotics, Pathology, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review