Modeling of self-healing effects in polymeric composites
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other modeling approaches explored in the literature to simulate crack healing behavior are based on the theory of porous media or the discrete element method.
“Other modeling approaches explored in the literature to simulate crack healing behavior are based on the theory of porous media ( Bluhm et al., 2015 ) or the discrete element method ( Luding and Suiker, 2008; Herbst and Luding, 2008 ).”
From A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials (2018) · cites this paper as Bluhm et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Bluhm, J., Specht, S., & Schröder, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Specht, S.
- Venue
- Archive of Applied Mechanics
- Published
- 2014-12-07
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1469-1481
- ISSN
- 0939-1533 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0681
- OpenAlex
- W1966283605
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archive of Applied Mechanics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Keywords
- self-healing materials, polymer composites, microencapsulated healing agents, catalysts, multiphase model, porous media theory, thermodynamically consistent model, microcracks, mass transfer, phase transitions, tapered double cantilever beam, crack healing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
