Cited by 241Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults

Sanada, Kiyoshi, Kearns, Charles F., Midorikawa, Taishi, Abe, Takashi·2006·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The present study was performed to develop regression-based prediction equations for skeletal muscle (SM) mass by ultrasound and to investigate the validity of these equations in Japanese adults. Seventy-two Japanese men (n=38) and women (n=34) aged 18-61 years participated in this study and were randomly separated into two groups: the model development group (n=48) and the validation group (n=24). The total and regional SM mass were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1.5 T-scanners with spin-echo sequence. Contiguous transverse images (about 150 slices) with a slice thickness of 1 cm were obtained from the first cervical vertebra to the ankle joints. The volume of SM was calculated from the summation of digitized cross-sectional area. The SM volume was converted into mass units (kg) by an assumed SM density of 1.04 kg l(-1). The muscle thickness (MTH) was measured by B-mode ultrasound (5 MHz scanning head) at nine sites on the anatomical SM belly. Strong correlations were observed between the site-matched SM mass (total, arm, trunk body, thigh, and lower leg) by MRI measurement and the MTH x height (in m) in the model development group (r=0.83-0.96 in men, r=0.53-0.91 in women, P<0.05). When the SM mass prediction equations were applied to the validation group, significant correlations were also observed between the MRI-measured and predicted SM mass (P<0.05). The predicted total SM mass for the validation group was 19.6 (6.5) kg and was not significantly differ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-005-0061-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pooling the spectrum of methods for knee extensor mass/size and strength was done due to their high validity and reliability minimizing selection bias.

    “We pooled the aforementioned spectrum of methods due to their high validity and reliability minimizing the selection bias (63–66).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 241

Authors
Sanada, K., Kearns, C. F., Midorikawa, T., & Abe, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sanada, Kiyoshi
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2005-10-19
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
24-31
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2016699109
Cited by
241
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
skeletal muscle mass, muscle thickness, ultrasonic measurement, prediction equations, muscle mass assessment, MRI validation, Japanese adults, muscle density
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Weights and Measures, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Muscle, Skeletal, Magnetic Resonance Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review