Cited by 176Muscle activation and electromyography studiesSports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Anatomical predictors of maximum isometric and concentric knee extensor moment

Blazevich, Anthony J., Coleman, David R., Horne, Sara, Cannavan, Dale·2009·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The most important anatomical determinants of in vivo joint moment magnitude have yet to be defined. Relationships between maximal knee extensor moment and quadriceps muscle volume, anatomical (ACSA) and physiological (PCSA) cross-sectional area, muscle architecture and moment arm (MA) were compared. Nineteen untrained men and women performed maximal isokinetic knee extensions under isometric conditions (90 degrees joint angle) and at 30 degrees and 300 degrees s(-1). Magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging techniques were used to measure vastus lateralis PCSA and fascicle length (FL), quadriceps ACSA, volume and patellar tendon MA. Muscle volume was the best predictor of extensor moment measured isometrically (R(2) = 0.60) and at 30 degrees s(-1)(R (2) = 0.74). PCSA x FL was the best predictor of moment at 300 degrees s(-1) (R(2) = 0.59). MA was not an important predictor. ACSA was the second best predictor at all three speeds and could be recommended as an ideal measure given its relative ease of measurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-008-0972-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 176

Authors
Blazevich, A. J., Coleman, D. R., Horne, S., & Cannavan, D.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • English Institute of Sport (GB)
Corresponding author
Blazevich, Anthony J.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2009-01-20
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
869-878
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2032245979
Cited by
176
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
knee extensor moment, anatomical cross-sectional area, physiological cross-sectional area, fascicle length, muscle architecture, moment arm, vastus lateralis, isometric knee extension, isokinetic strength
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Ultrasonography, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review