Anatomical predictors of maximum isometric and concentric knee extensor moment
Abstract
The most important anatomical determinants of in vivo joint moment magnitude have yet to be defined. Relationships between maximal knee extensor moment and quadriceps muscle volume, anatomical (ACSA) and physiological (PCSA) cross-sectional area, muscle architecture and moment arm (MA) were compared. Nineteen untrained men and women performed maximal isokinetic knee extensions under isometric conditions (90 degrees joint angle) and at 30 degrees and 300 degrees s(-1). Magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging techniques were used to measure vastus lateralis PCSA and fascicle length (FL), quadriceps ACSA, volume and patellar tendon MA. Muscle volume was the best predictor of extensor moment measured isometrically (R(2) = 0.60) and at 30 degrees s(-1)(R (2) = 0.74). PCSA x FL was the best predictor of moment at 300 degrees s(-1) (R(2) = 0.59). MA was not an important predictor. ACSA was the second best predictor at all three speeds and could be recommended as an ideal measure given its relative ease of measurement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In addition to morphological changes in the muscle, joint mechanical properties such as PTMA may make a small contribution to maximal torque production.
“In addition to morphological changes in the muscle, joint mechanical properties such as PTMA may make a small contribution to maximal torque production (17, 77).”
From What makes long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Blazevich, A. J., Coleman, D. R., Horne, S., & Cannavan, D.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- English Institute of Sport (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Blazevich, Anthony J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 869-878
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-6319
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W2032245979
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- knee extensor moment, anatomical cross-sectional area, physiological cross-sectional area, fascicle length, muscle architecture, moment arm, vastus lateralis, isometric knee extension, isokinetic strength
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Ultrasonography, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review